The study of the mind has a long history going back to (at least) the ancient world, yet the scientific study of the mind has a much shorter history. It is difficult to pick an exact year in which a change began, yet many people agree that the founding of the first psychological laboratory in Germany in 1879 was a very important point in time. Founded by Wilhelm Wundt, the laboratory was concerned with moving away from philosophy, and moving towards measuring more objective and empirical observations under the banner of psychology?
Cognitive Revolution
While the establishment of the first psychological laboratory is clearly important, perhaps the most significant period of time was the mid-to-late 1950s and early 1960s. The events from that period, and how they have shaped modern-day psychology, are often called the cognitive revolution.
During this time period prominent theories began to emerge that had a common basis: they addressed questions about the mind through scientific observation; and the theories that were constructed considered the mind a complex information processor. We can use the more specific topic of memory as an example. In 1956 a key paper was published by George Miller titled The magic number seven, plus or minus twoâ in which Miller suggested that the limits of short-term memory could be extended by processing information in larger groups (known as chunking); Peterson and Peterson, in 1959, used observations on forgetting nonsense syllables to propose separate information-processing stages in short-term memory; while in 1960, Sperling demonstrated the existence of a very transitory memory that held information for a short period of time, and theorised a set of processing stages associated with this. All of these research articles are now regarded as classics in this field, and all came from a specific period in time when these types of theory were first being talked about and written about. You will learn about how these early theories have influenced current thinking in later chapters.
Part of the development of cognitive psychology as a complete field (not just one about memory) was due to similar achievements being made at roughly the same time by many other researchers and scientists addressing other aspects of cognition, including linguists and computer scientists.
It is commonly accepted that World War II also encouraged the growth of the discipline in at least two ways. First, research usually requires money to make it happen. Military interest in a variety of topics such as vigilance, creativity, attention and perception meant that cognitive psychologists were able to obtain military funding to advance their research. Furthermore, the more unfortunate consequence of war was that casualties suffering from brain injuries offered opportunities to study the relationship between the mind and the brain in ways that were not possible before.
The development of cognitive psychology as an area of study was also helped by the publication of the book Cognitive Psychology (Neisser, 1967, which solidified not only the name but the topic of study, and the importance of information-processing models for it. This was followed by journals dedicated to publishing original research in this field such as Cognitive Psychology, Cognition and Memory & Cognition, as well as national and international conferences, dedicated research laboratories, and research teams across the world. It was an exciting time for cognitive psychology and an important point in the discipline's history.
Cognition and Behaviourism
In telling the story of the origins of cognitive psychology, attention is often given to the differences between the types of theories cognitive psychologists wanted to develop and the types of theories that other psychologists, particularly behaviourists, wanted to develop. Behaviourism, in very simple terms, is the idea that psychology can be studied by looking at relationships between behaviours without needing to theorise about things such as a mind. Now, like the definition of cognitive psychology, there would be some debate about this exact definition. For our purposes, this âstrongâ form of behaviourism is interesting because it highlights an important aspect of cognitive psychology. Where behaviourists avoid theories about the internal structures of our minds, cognitive psychologists rely upon them when presenting their ideas and theories. This challenges us (and people past) to question what the best approach is: one in which we look at behaviours only; or one in which we believe we can make claims about internal mental processes and the structure of the mind. In terms of popularity, cognitive psychologists âwonâ. They have been a meaningful part of mainstream psychology for the past 50 years.
Task
In your own words, describe the difference between cognitive psychology and the strong form of behaviourism as presented here. Which of the two versions do you consider to be the best? Why?
Cognitive Psychology Today
Cognitive psychology remains an integral part of modern psychology. The number of journals that publish original research continues to grow as researchers begin to turn their attention to how cognitive psychology can inform other disciplines. Teachers and researchers of cognitive psychology continue to be supported by dedicated research laboratories, national and international societies, and national and international conferences as well as constantly advancing technologies and the development of new and interesting methods. Students of psychology across the world are exposed to the ideas, theories and methods of cognitive psychology as central parts of their curriculum, with many of them becoming the new generation of rese...