Part One
Negotiating Pop Styles
1
More Than Zero
Post-Punk Ideology (and Its Rejection) in Bret Easton Ellis
Matthew Luter
More than any other literary fiction of its time, Bret Easton Ellisâs debut novel Less Than Zero (1985) revels not only in the presence of pop music in its charactersâ sun-soaked lives, but also in the variety of artifacts and discourses that surround being part of a local music scene. Ellis isnât just writing about MTV-era new wave and a particularly privileged set of young listeners here; heâs writing about Los Angeles music, and L.A. post-punk of the early 1980s at that. While at home over Christmas break from a small Northeastern college, Ellisâs main character Clay finds himself drawn back into his old friendsâ lifestyle of casual sex, drug use, and pornography, and all the while, of-the-moment music and discussion of it stays prominent. Less Than Zero places great emphasis not on ârock and rollâ as an idea or an expressive form in a general way, but on a localized scene, a fairly specific set of rock subgenres, and a highly present-minded set of characters from a particular cultural milieu. As a result, Ellisâs novel depicts a particular set of ideological concerns, questions them, and, via Clayâs decisions in the bookâs final pages, winds up rejecting a dominant ideology of superficial, privileged self-indulgenceâat least in part.
While many critics have discussed the presence of rock music in Bret Easton Ellisâs Less Than Zero, most such writing about this sun-soaked novel of the privileged young has approached rock as an uncomplicated, monolithic, and destructive phenomenon. We should be unsurprised, most of the bookâs earliest reviews suggest, that these infantile Los Angelenos seem callous and cold-blooded, given that they assault their ears with this dreck. Instead, I will propose here that reading Ellisâs use of post-punk and early alternative rock (alt-rock) in a more ideologically sophisticated mannerâalongside the work of pop critic/historians such as Michael Azerrad and Simon Reynolds as well as sociologist of youth culture Dick Hebdigeâreveals that musical allusions in Ellisâs novel are more than background noise.
Those references are also ideological signifiers, as many artists mentioned by Ellisâs characters produce work that incorporates (usually leftist) political discourse. Consequently, I argue that we cannot read these characters as naĂŻvely apoliticalâthey consistently expose themselves to ideological argument, albeit through KROQ and not Nightline. For example, many have observed that the novel takes its title from an Elvis Costello song, but few have investigated the significance of the songâs antifascist lyrics. Similarly, references to the L.A. punk band X permeate the novel, including a description of the song âLos Angelesâ that seems to spur the novelâs narrator to leave town in the bookâs final pages. Close attention to that song, like others that these characters mention (and still others that they reject, or recall enjoying only retrospectively), will illuminate these charactersâ worldview. I acknowledge that Ellisâs characters are rarely aware of just how politically nuanced this music is, but, crucially, Ellis is keenly aware of these nuances. As a result, musical references are intentionally chosen in order to reveal authorial judgments of these characters. Instead of dismissing appearances of pop music in Less Than Zero as irrelevant or beneath comment, I propose that taking seriously the embedded meanings of this deliberately catalogued music leads to a fuller understanding of just what this novel and its characters are choosing to embrace and to reject. We must not assume that a novel lacks ideological depth simply because most of its characters lack that depth.
* * *
Existing criticism of Less Than Zero has been perceptive with regard to form, but, I would argue, less so with regard to content. Both contemporary reviews of Ellisâs novel and later criticism frequently compare the bookâs form to the aesthetics of quick-cut 1980s television, but they donât necessarily mean it as a compliment. In The New York Times, Michiko Kakutani refers to the bookâs âfast-paced, video-like clips,â1 while an unsigned New Republic review claims that, âReading it is like watching MTV,â pointing out the novelâs âbrief, videoesque vignettes,â each â[w]ritten in the inarticulate style of a petulant suburban punk.â2 Less dismissively, in a landmark critical essay on televisionâs influence on 1980s fiction, Cecelia Tichi uses Less Than Zero as a prime example of a novel that values what she calls âflowâ over linear narrative. Works like Ellisâs âdo not begin; they simply start, as if turned on or come upon.â3 As a result, she argues, âreaders are made to feel that, instead of a beginning, there is a point of entryâ (Tichi, 121). Consequently, reading the famously fragmented Less Than Zero, with its sudden chapter openings and endings and abrupt entrances and exits of minor characters, bears less resemblance to the traditional realist novel than it does to that distinctly cable-era mode of TV viewing, channel surfing.
But as much as characters in Less Than Zero are depicted watching televisionâusually MTVâthey spend even more time listening to music, discussing it, noticing whoâs wearing which bandâs T-shirt, and figuring out what act is playing where and when. All of this information is deeply tied to its place and time. In response, Alan Bilton contends that, as Less Than Zero has aged, it âhas also become increasingly abstractâ (Bilton, 201):
If you donât recognize the logo or the label, then the signs no longer signify anything (beyond being badges of pure consumerism) floating free across the page. With each passing year, the work becomes more weightless, intangible, evacuated of meaning.4
If Bilton is right, he is correct only in a quite limited way; I would counter that his claim is true only for the reader who is uninterested in the politics of the popular. Less Than Zero can still be read fruitfully by someone who doesnât recognize every band name in the book, an assertion to which anyone who has taught the novel to students born well after its publication can attest. But there is a cohesive and developing ideology attached to Ellisâs specific uses of musical signifiers throughout the text, and in order to fully grasp that ideological meaning, a reader must accept that those signifiers are singularly and intentionally selected by the author. In other words, what Bilton doesnât fully acknowledge is that not all namedrops of rock bands are created equal.
Reading this novel as profoundly ideologically motivated, then, requires letting go of some rather stereotypical (and not particularly enlightening) ways of approaching rock music in literary criticism. In other words, if we approach, say, the two epigraphs of the novelâlyrics from Led Zeppelin and from Xâwith knowledge that, while both are rock bands, broadly speaking, the two artists represent quite different things to Ellisâs characters, then we wind up seeing cultural forces in conflict that are both more subtle and more critically revelatory than any easy contrast between âliteratureâ and âpop,â or ârockâ and ânon-rock.â
For example: a footnote in Peter Freeseâs article on Less Than Zero reads, âAmong the numerous rock singers and bands referred to in the novel the following were identified as actually existing.â5 Granted, Freeseâs essay appeared well before the early-1990s entry of so-called âalternativeâ music into the mainstream or the ability to track down data about any band via the web, and, he allows, âthe traditional literary critic has a hard time unraveling the significance of rock lyricsâ (Freese, 69). But an unperceptive comment like Freeseâs highlights how this novelâand, for that matter, any number of other pop-centric textsâbenefits from criticism attuned to the subtle ideological, aesthetic, and political meanings of even the most banal-seeming artifacts of youth culture. And it helps to recognize that nearly all popular culture, but youth culture in particular, moves fast: indeed, Clay describes his promo poster for Trust as advertising for âan old Elvis Costello record,â one released way back in 1981, a whole four years prior to the novelâs publication (Ellis, 11). In reading Less Than Zero well, one must be prepared to explicate these references usefully; otherwise, it becomes all too easy to make unfounded assumptions about how those characters respond to and use the music they consume.
Moreover, such assumptions lead to stereotypes regarding how damaging the music allegedly is. Freese also refers to Ellisâs quick mention of âThe Earthquake Songâ by the Little Girls, a (basically harmless) minor local hit by a bubble-gummy girl group, as âhilariously tastelessâ and surprisingly not âthe authorâs outrageous inventionâ (Freese, 86). He also offers a catalog of song titles mentioned in the novel that imply violence, pornography, or doomed romance, but to readers who know the music well, most of his examples appear rather innocuous (Freese, 78). Duran Duranâs âHungry Like the Wolfâ or Soft Cellâs âTainted Love,â to Ellisâs characters and to loads of nostalgic listeners alike, are just good dance tracks. Yes, the Clashâs âSomebody Got Murderedâ gets name-checked, but when literary critics engage in apocalyptic hand-wringing over the content of the music that these kids seem to dig, they sometimes lose sight of the factânot, I would hasten to add, lost on many listeners to this musicâthat, for instance, the Clash might actually be ⌠you know, anti-murder. (Iâd apply the same line of thinking to Xâs âSex and Dying in High Societyâ and âAdult Books,â also noted by name elsewhere in the text.) Moralizing critics also run the risk of sounding like the alarmist televangelists Clay describes with ridicule: âtwo guys, priests, preachers maybe, on the screen, forty, maybe forty-five, wearing business suits and ties, pink-tinted sunglasses, talking about Led Zeppelin records, saying that, if theyâre played backwards, they âpossess alarming passages about the devilâ â (Ellis, 87). Freese, like so many others, gets right that Ellis mimics the aesthetic of MTV. But his take on the music of Less Than Zero is marred by its treatment of rock as a monolithic phenomenon; he offers unchecked suspicion of the surely deleterious effect of this musicâat best, trashy and, at worst, immoralâon these young people, but pays little attention to why Ellis may have chosen a particular piece of music for a particular purpose.
Of course, to dismiss the importance of pop music by painting it with such a broad brush is also to ignore ho...