1
Women ThenâHow We Got Here
âPreach if you must, but donât call it that!â1
From the moment Mary Magdalene proclaimed, âI have seen the Lord,â women have been preaching the gospel. More often than not, as John Wesley intoned to Sarah Crosby, they have not called it that. The struggle over whether women might legitimately and authoritatively preach the gospel begins with the first proclamation of the resurrection and continues into the present through a series of dueling definitions and juxtaposed job titles. Over the centuries women have proved exceedingly creative at working around the restrictions placed upon them. When women were not allowed to preach, they renamed their pronouncements prophecy. When women were cloistered from society, they emerged as teachers. When women were denied access to the pulpit, they testified from the pew.
In a twist of nomenclature, when the prophesying, teaching, or testimony of women was at odds with church prescriptions, those opposed to what the women had to say would accuse them of preaching. Such a charge could then be used to silence their voices even though the women had taken great care to label their discourses according to the acceptable precepts of their day. Thus, not only were women told repeatedly that they could not preach, they were also silenced with the charge of illegitimate preaching. Such semantic maneuvering did little to keep women âsilent in the churchesâ (1 Cor 14:34). Indeed, the subject of silence would never have been mentioned in the First Letter to the Corinthians if the women had not been speaking out.
Next to presiding over the Eucharist, the component of worship most vested with claims to authority is preaching. Historically, the church has understood Godâs word to be present in the act of preaching through the preacher and in the words preached, thereby investing the person of the preacher with extraordinary significance. An attempt to reconstruct, in broad strokes, how and when women functioned as preachersâwhether they called it that or notâin the earliest centuries of the church can provide clues for how certain attitudes toward women have become entrenched in church tradition. Obviously, the roles women constructed for themselves, as well as the parts that were scripted for them by others, continue to inform our opinions about women as preachers in the church today. A closer look at this history can help us understand some of our current practices and some of our ingrained assumptions, but more importantly it can move us all, men and women, toward a more faithful construction of the Christian community in which âthere is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and femaleâ (Gal 3:28).
Assumptions
The case has been made repeatedly that women occupied Jesusâ inner circle, they worked alongside their male counterparts to spread the gospel in the first decades of Christianity, and they died alongside men as early Christian martyrs.2 The question, therefore, is not whether women participated in church leadership, including preaching, but what brought about their exclusion and why did it happen? Though the leadership of women in the church was never free from contestation, the progression of the church through the first few centuries shows a regression of women from leadership in the life of church. Mapping this reality will help us understand the ramifications of this systematic exclusion for women preachers today.
In order to understand when and how women participated in the proclamation of the word during the first few centuries of the church, it is first necessary to know something about preaching during those years. While the New Testament contains speech fragments that might broadly be defined as sermons, there is no extant sermon recorded in scripture.3 Even Jesusâ Sermon on the Mount is widely acknowledged to be a compilation of sayings, to say nothing of the fact that assigning the designation of âChristian preachingâ to the one who inaugurated Christianity creates a different dilemma. The speeches of Paul and some of the other apostles cataloged in the Acts of the Apostles might be claimed as missionary sermons, yet nearly all of them follow a similar formula that indicates more about what an early church sermon should be than the text of a specific sermon. From these sermons we can infer that preaching during the first few decades of the church began with a section from the Hebrew Bible, added the claim that Jesus represents the fulfillment of that promise as verified by the witness of the apostles, and concluded with a call for those listening to repent and believe. This basic outline was repeated in large assemblies (Acts 2:14ff.) and secluded areas (Acts 16:13ff.), to hostile crowds (Acts 7:2ff.) and receptive audiences (Acts 11:19ff.).
Sparse information about preaching in the early decades of Christianity is compounded by the paucity of information about women during this time. We learn about the role of women in the first few centuries of the church primarily from three kinds of sources.4 The first source, official documents such as council canons and church orders, provides valuable information about womenâs leadership roles by virtue of describing the churchâs official position on women and prescribing the roles for women in the church. Examples of such official statements include 1 Timothy 3 and later documents such as the Apostolic Tradition5 and Didascalia Apostolorum. These sources should be considered very close to the reality for women during the time period they were composed, or at least close to the churchâs official policy, even if local practices might have reflected a slightly different reality.
The next source is less reliable as an authentic depiction of women. It includes popular narratives and celebratory accounts of women, both fictitious and historical, and tells us more about the social construction of women. The women in these accounts are presented as heroines of the faith, heroism often taking the guise of defying the cultural expectations for women in favor of ascetic purity. Often the script reflects popular Hellenistic literature of the time, replete with exotic travel, dangerous barbarians, and daring rescues. At the end of these stories, however, union with oneâs beloved is replaced by a life of âinspiring virtue.â6 The Acts of Paul and Thecla and stories about Maximilla, a leader in the New Prophecy,7 figure prominently in this category.
The final category, formal theological works, provides descriptions of women that reflect the authorâs model of ideal womanhood. While generally positive, material in this category can be couched negatively so as to link theological distinctions between sin and salvation with womenâs bodies. Examples of this source include biographies such as The Life of Saint Macrina or The Life of Melania, the Younger, both of which provide examples of the âpurityâ of women who avoid sexual activity.
Within the category of formal writing there are only four texts from these early centuries believed to have been written by women,8 and only one of them, The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitia, relates explicitly to the role of women in ecclesiology. The other three are not overtly ecclesial: The Martyrdom of St. Cyprian,9 written by Eudokia, the wife of a high-ranking court official in the first half of the fifth century; The Pilgrimage of Egeria,10 by a woman who apparently occupied the highest social strata of the late fourth or early fifth century; and Cento,11 written in the middle of the fourth century by Faltonia Proba. The fact that we can name all four of these texts also accentuates the paucity of material available about the early church from the women themselves.
The value of these writing samples is, chiefly, to demonstrate the difference between how women write about themselves and how men write about women. This is seen clearly in The Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitia. Unlike the other three writings, this text, dating from the early third century, describes a specific ecclesial subject. Embedded within the narrative is a first-person account of the events leading up to the martyrdom of Perpetua and those who were martyred with her. The work is an intimate and detailed account of the environment of the early church, specifically from the perspective of a woman. Her refusal to recant the Christian faith demonstrates her rejection of conventional society in order to make Christianity the highest claim on her life. The text vividly portrays how this rejection was not a callous disregard for those around her. In fact, Perpetua writes with great pathos of the pity she felt for her father, who âwas the only member of my family who would find no reason for joy in my suffering.â12 The most poignant parts of the narrative, however, deal with Perpetuaâs love for her child. She writes of the terror she felt for the health and safety of the child and the tra...