1
The Use of the Bible in Ethics
A Starting Point for a Restorative Reading of Scripture
Christians often disagree on moral and political issues, but they usually agree that Christian ethical judgments ought to be demonstrably consistent with the teaching of Scripture in general and with the message of the Christian gospel in particular. They accept that in wrestling with difficult moral questions, believers have a duty to reflect carefully on what the Bible has to say about the matter, much like the synagogue congregation in Berea that âwelcomed the message very eagerly and examined the Scriptures every day to see whether these things were soâ (Acts 17:11). Even as levels of biblical literacy in churches continue to plummet, and the extent of engagement with the biblical text in most Sunday sermons is modest at best, there remains an instinctive feeling among the faithful that the Bible is important, and that even the declarations of bishops, cardinals, and church leaders need ultimately to be tested against Holy Writ.
What is less clear is how to do this. How should the Scriptures properly function in Christian ethical reflection? How are the sometime discordant voices of the biblical writers to be rightly appropriated when considering contested moral issues, including those to do with the nature of justice? This is the starting point for any attempt to develop a biblical theology of restorative justice.
Sources of Ethical Guidance
The Components of Christian Ethics
Ethics may be understood as the systematic study of the moral principles, values, and obligations that guide human behavior. While âmoralityâ concerns the evaluation of such behavior as right or wrong, good or bad, âethicsâ is the theoretical analysis of the major ingredients that shape and validate these moral judgments. âChristianâ ethics is the attempt to understand and justify moral obligation in relation to the will of God, the Creator, Redeemer, and Sustainer of all. This makes Christian ethics a distinctive enterprise. That is not to say that the content of Christian moral values is radically different from the content of non-Christian values. There are important differences, but Christian attitudes to what is right and wrong are often widely shared by non-Christians. The distinctiveness of Christian ethics lies primarily in the way Christians understand the ultimate origin and sanction of these values. At the heart of Christian ethics lies an appeal to revelation. Christian ethical judgments are governed ultimately by belief in the self-disclosure of Godâs own moral character and will, pre-eminently in the person and work of Jesus Christ, not by the dictates of human reason, affections, volition or environmental conditioning.
In the attempt to clarify the ethical corollaries of divine revelation, Christian ethics draws on five main sources of guidance.
Scripture
The Bible serves as the primary record of Godâs self-disclosure in the events of salvation-history, as apprehended by the community of faith. Inasmuch as it presents God as a righteous Being who requires righteousness of his creatures, the Bible is profoundly concerned with ethics. According to biblical tradition, ethical behavior stands in a two-fold relationship to Godâs self-revelation. On the one hand, it is a response of gratitude for Godâs saving acts in history, while on the other hand those saving acts themselves provide the pattern and standard for human conduct. The people of God are enjoined to model their behavior on the actions of God; the covenant requires nothing less than the âimitation of Godâ (Lev 11:45). The meaning of âjustice,â for instance, is arrived at not by contemplating some abstract norm of justice, but by remembering how God delivered his people from oppression, and then acting accordingly. For Christian ethics, the imitation of God centers on the imitation of Christ (1 Pet 2:21), whose concrete manner of living and acting is known to us only through the biblical record.
Theological Tradition
Revelation, including biblical revelation, is received, reflected on, and interpreted by the people of God, down through history. This interpretation and application of revelation constitutes the theological and moral tradition of Christianity, which serves as a second source for discerning Godâs will. It is not only the Catholic church that so uses tradition; all branches of Christianity have appealed to historical precedents and experience in formulating moral and doctrinal teaching. Such tradition is more than a collection of dogmatic and moral propositions transmitted from the past; it is also the âstoryâ of a particular people, handed on and re-appropriated by each generation. We cannot separate ourselves from our traditions and heritage. We enter into life in the midst of tradition; we are fundamentally shaped by tradition; and even our ability to question and change tradition comes from the tradition itself.
Moral Philosophy
The great moral traditions of Western philosophy, which have appealed principally to the exercise of human reason for the determination of right and wrong, have also had a profound impact on both the content and methodology of Christian ethics (the very word âethicsâ is the legacy of Greek philosophy). Of particular significance has been the concept of natural law, which has been very influential in Catholic moral theology. The extent to which natural law considerations should shape Christian ethics is much contested, but some concept of a ânaturalâ revelation of Godâs moral will accessible to all humanity in virtue of creation has played a role in most expressions of Christian ethics, including New Testament ethics.
Empirical Data
Christian ethics is more than a speculative exercise; it also requires attention to the full range of contextual factors that bear on each ethical situation. Indeed, the first task of moral analysis is to clarify the decision-making situation and identify the range of available options. The data furnished by the social sciences and by other empirical analyses thus has an indispensable role in ethical discernment. The special contribution of such descriptive research is to keep ethical evaluation in touch with reality, where the rubber hits the road.
The Spirit-in-Community
The New Testament places great emphasis on a twofold role for the Holy Spirit in Christian ethical lifeâthat of bringing about inner moral renewal in believers so that they spontaneously manifest ethical virtues, and of guiding them in ethical decision-making. Moral character-formation and moral decision-making are inseparably linked within the Spiritâs orbit. It is crucial to recognize that in the New Testament the Spiritâs work is expressed in the context of the Church. âPaul knows nothing of solitary religion or individual morality,â explains W. D. Davies, âbut rather sees the Christian firmly based in the community.â The gathered community provides the necessary checks and balances that prevent the Spiritâs direction degenerating into individualistic subjectivism.
This list of the main sources of Christian ethics invites two immediate observations. The first is that while the five components may be conceptually distinguished, they are in practice inseparable. Scripture cannot be entirely distinguished from tradition, since Scripture is both the product of tradition and the shaper of tradition. Empirical data does not exist in isolation from the moral values and ideological commitments that govern the gathering, classification and interpretation of data. The Spiritâs guidance of the community is not merely intuitive but often employs the text of Scripture and the wisdom learned from ecclesiastical tradition or scientific discovery. The five sources, then, are intertwined. Yet there is still value in notionally distinguishing them, for in different Christian traditions different constituents have the dominant role, although in all traditions ethical arguments gain in persuasiveness by employing all five in an ongoing conversation.
Secondly, our delineation of several sources of ethical guidance shows that the catch-cry sola Scriptura does not really apply in Christian ethics. âScripture alone,â contends Gustafson, âis never the final court of appeal for Christian ethics.â By itself the Bible is not enough to tell us what to do. The Bible may be a necessary source for Christian ethical reflection, but it is not a sufficient resource on its own. Arriving at moral judgments entails a dialectic between scriptural and non-scriptural factors, between considerations based on circumstance and rational inquiry and those that appeal to the biblical witness. The challenge of Christian ethics is to achieve a judicious ba...