Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this study is to set forth a hypothesis regarding the meaning and function of âthe fear of Godâ in Paulâs theology by examining its role in 2 Cor 7:1 within its literary context and salvation-history.1 Although âthe fear of Godâ is a significant theme in the OT, from which Paul derived the main lines of his thought, his use of the motif has seldom been studied. This is striking given the fact that Paul mentions âfearâ repeatedly in his letters, employing a range of terminology.2 Moreover, 2 Cor 7:1, as the climax of the argument of 6:14â7:1, is arguably the most significant place to begin in understanding Paulâs use of the fear of God because it is the only place, where, in one setting, Paul: (1) uses fear with explicit reference to God (Ďá˝šÎ˛ÎżĎ Î¸ÎľÎżáżŚ), (2) requires it of believers,3 and (3) relates it to an OT source.4
Because of its uncommon vocabulary,5 its unique catena of OT citations,6 and its exclusive instructions concerning unbelievers,7 2 Cor 6:14â7:1 has of course formed the center of much scholarly discussion. These debates have focused largely on the identification of the Scriptural citations in 6:16câ18, the connection to other contemporary Jewish documents, and its authenticity and/or integrity in 2 Corinthians. At the same time, however, scholarly treatments of 6:14â7:1 have paid comparatively little attention to 7:1, where Paul summarizes his previous arguments with a concluding exhortation:
Therefore (Îżá˝Î˝), beloved ones, since we have these promises, let us cleanse ourselves from every defilement regarding flesh and spirit, thus completing holiness, which is brought about by the fear of God.8
Moreover, it has seldom been noticed that, even though this verse picks up all of the other central aspects in the catena of OT citations in 6:16câ18 (cf. its reference to âthese promises,â âcleansing from defilement,â and âcompleting holinessâ), the motif of âthe fear of Godâ seems to appear without introduction or preceding reference. Both arguing for and against Pauline authorship of 6:14â7:1, scholars have not pointed out this surprising feature of 7:1, nor have they provided a satisfactory answer regarding why the fear of God is referenced in 7:1, what it means, and hence how it functions in the argument.
This present study, therefore, takes as its starting point the following questions: âWhat motivates the reference to the fear of God in 2 Cor 7:1?â âWhat, in view of the answer to this question, does this motif actually mean in 2 Cor 7:1?â and finally, âWhat role does this motif play in 2 Cor 7:1 and, furthermore, in 2 Cor 6:14â7:1?â This present study seeks to answer these questions by first exploring this motif in the various OT passages explicitly cited in 6:16câ18, which lead up to the climactic assertion about the fear of God in 7:1, and then by comparing the understanding of this OT motif with the use of the same motif in representative Second Temple Jewish documents. The premise of the study is that these traditional Jewish understandings of the fear of God, especially those found in an eschatological context, will shed light on Paulâs understanding and use of the fear of God in 2 Cor 7:1.
I. Status Quaestionis
Compared with the vast swathe of studies on 2 Cor 6:14â7:1, scholarly discussions about the fear of God in 7:1 are scarce in number and divergent in their interpretations. On the one hand, scholars who do not accept the Pauline authorship of 2 Cor 6:14â7:1 argue that the fear of God in 7:1 is a Christian âstylistic modificationâ of an interpolated fragment (probably from Essene material)9 or âa non-Pauline phrase, pointing, as in Judaism, to the eschatological judgment.â10 On the other hand, scholars who accept Pauline authorship of the passage mostly acknowledge the connection between âthe fear of Godâ in 7:1 and âthe fear of the Lordâ in 5:11, and interpret the fear of God as a response to Godâs final judgment.11 However, these scholars differ in their understanding not only of the nature of âthe fear of God,â12 but also of its origin in this context.13 The reason for this variance is twofold: first, as I will discuss below, the traditional âdual understandingâ of the fear of God that distinguishes two kinds of fear (negative/positive) fails to explain the fear of God in 7:1. Here, both negative and positive features of fear seem to joinâthe fear of God alludes to the final judgment as in 5:10â11 (negative fear), and at the same time promotes the holiness of believers (positive fear).14 Thus, in order to understand the fear of God in 7:1, a different explanation is required that can include both features.15 Second, as with the other referents of 7:1, one should seek to understand the fear of God in 7:1 against the OT background of 6:16câ18. Although scholars have often referred to the OT context in general as the background for the motif of the fear of God in 7:1, such as the common appeal to the role of the fear of the Lord in wisdom literature, few have attempted to explain the motif against the backdrop of the specific OT citations of 6:16câ18.16
In sum, despite the acknowledgment of the eschatological weight that the fear of God carries in 7:1 (especially in light of 5:10â11), there has not been a detailed analysis of its function within the immediate argument of 6:14â7:1. However, by neglecting the backdrop of the specific OT passages cited in 6:16câ18 against which Paul understands the fear of God in 7:1, as well as the wider context in 2 Corinthians of Paulâs discussion of his ânew covenantâ ministry and his corresponding exhortations to the Corinthians as âthe temple of the living Godâ (6:16), one fails to see the significant role and function that the fear of God takes up in Paulâs thought. Therefore, a study of the fear of God is needed that illumines both the narrow relationship between 6:14â18 and 7:1, and the broad relationship between 7:1 and 2 Corinthians. Moreover, despite the numerous attempts to explain the other aspects in 7:1 against a Second Temple Jewish background, none of these attempts traces the treatment of the motif of the fear of God in the literature of Second Temple Judaism in order to establish the context in which this aspect of Paulâs argument stands. Hence, a closer examination of the understanding of the fear of God in the Second Temple period will help us to see how Paulâs understanding of the fear of God corresponds to and deviates from his contemporary setting.
II. The Problem Raised by Lexicography
There have been several significant lexicographical studies of the motif of âthe fear of Godâ in the OT and NT, all of which have argued that the latter is almost exclusively dependent upon the former.17 Thus, it is important to start our examination of the fear of God first in the OT, where this motif appears more prominently than in the NT itself.18
1. The Meaning of the Fear of God in the OT
According to
TLOT, the vast majority of occurrences of âfearâ (
) in the OT (about 80 percent) exhibit a theological usage, i.e., âthe fear of God.â
19 For example, the adjectival form, âfrightfulâ (
), is used as an attribute of God,
20 of his name,
21 of his deeds,
22 and of his eschatological day of judgment,
23 while the verb, âto fearâ (
), appears in relation to the experience of Godâs theophanic presence,
24 in relation to Godâs deeds as a historical activity and demonstration of power,
25 such as the creation,
26 the Exodus,
27 or the punishment of the evil ones,
28 and in relation to the sanctuary
29 or to an individual man/the people of God.
30 In sum, in the OT God is to be feared not through his dreadful works alone, but also in response to his majesty and holiness.
31 According to this, âfearâ carries also a positive and active aspect, since Godâs acts as well as his power, holiness, and majesty not only elicit âfearâ from those who are in rebellion against God, but also demand a positive acknowledgment of fear from his faithful people. In other words, âfearâ in OT contexts results not only from the threat itself, but also in response to the author of the threat, so that âfearâ also becomes a âreverenceâ that leads people to submissive recognition.32 In this regard, this aspect of the fear of God identifies itself with the peopleâs obedience to God, expressed in their observance of moral laws and cultic demands. With this development, the fear of God loses its original emotional character of fearing Godâs punishment or judgment altogether.33 MiklĂłs PĂĄlfy thus contends that this positive aspect of fear is related to the âpious attitudeâ in the OT for which God constantly exhorts his people to strive:
Da jedoch der hebräische Mensch der Unsicherheit und Relativität der âFurcht vor der Gottheitâ bewuĂt war, verwendet er den Begriff jirâat jahwe sehr oft zur Bezeichnung des Verhältnisses von Gott und Mensch bzw. der FrĂśmmigkeit im Alten Testament.34
Scholars argue that this positive and active aspect of fear, which appears at various places throughout the OT, is to be distinguished from its negative sense of âterror,â and denotes a human attitude of submission that expresses itself in human conduct that is orientated to the will of God. For example, in Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic literature, the fear of God appears âin a series of formulae which demand piety oriented to the Deuteronomist Law.â35 In these passages, fearing God functions positively and describes the corresponding result of obedience to Godâs word and commandments.36 This entails obedience to the demand to hear his voice or serve him,37 so that G...