Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on âCancel Subscriptionâ - itâs as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time youâve paid for. Learn more here.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access The Last Opera by Chandler Carter in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Mezzi di comunicazione e arti performative & Musica lirica. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
COMPOSER IGOR STRAVINSKY AND POET W. H. AUDENâTWO of the finest artists and most compelling minds of the twentieth centuryâcollaborated from the fall of 1947 through the summer of 1951 on an opera, The Rakeâs Progress. At the time, their self-consciously conventional work seemed to appeal only to conservative audiences. Few perceived the creators were also confronting the central crisis of the modern age, for their story of a hapless eighteenth-century Everyman dramatizes the very limits of human will, a theme Auden insists underlies all Opera.
The story of their collaboration, the opera itself, and its subsequent reception also reveal each manâs struggle to assert himself. Inner vision and outer forces especially drove the life and work of Stravinsky. He possessed perhaps the most distinctly individual voice in twentieth-century music, yet openly sought to be influenced and not just musically. Friends and colleagues he drew in close positively shaped his personal and professional choices, especially in his early and later years; those he kept at a distance did so negatively. The larger world of ideas and events, both great and terrible, likewise molded him. Revolution and world wars twice dislocated him from his home and loved ones, severing old ties and creating new ones; politics, in government and in the arts, stifled as well as kindled opportunities; competing ideologies established the terms we use to discuss his music and with which even the composer defined himself.
My title is more conversation starter than definitive claim. Auden might have approved, though he would have thought of his collaboration with Stravinsky as a new first opera rather the last. Shortly after he delivered the completed libretto on March 31, 1948, the poet wrote for Vogue a light piece explaining the opera fanatic as he understood him:
He is a conservative who does not welcome new opera; there are too many from the Golden Age which he has still to hear. That age is over: after Verdi and Wagner come Puccini and Strauss, but one can not listen to either without being conscious that this is the end of something. From Gluck until them the development of the form is continuous and organic, but there it stops. New operas may and, let us hope, will be written, but their composers can not carry on from where their predecessors left off, but must start anew from the beginning.4
Auden neither openly confessed to being such a fanatic nor did he mention his ongoing collaboration with the worldâs most famous living composer, though neither was a secret. (Lincoln Kirstein described the poet to Stravinsky: âHe adores opera; he spends half his time playing records of Mozart and Verdi; for him opera is a ritual.â5) The irony, or at least tension between these two conditions, was not lost on the librettist; rather, he was attempting, implicitly, to frame the creation of their new opera in light of that tension. How does one go about creating sung drama in the mid-twentieth century? If conventional opera doesnât interest you, then explore new creative paths. Yet, if you love Operaâas Stravinsky, Auden, and Kallman all professedâfollowing that well-traveled road would seem, as the poet suggests, to lead to a dead end. And just how does one âstart anew from the beginningâ? These questions form a jumping off point for my exploration of The Rake, its creators, and its place in the operatic canon.
Artists and critics have been pronouncing the death of major art formsâpainting, the novel, and balletâfor almost a century.6 With the demise of old Europe, so the reasoning goes, came the demise of its cultured institutions. Like Auden, many date the end of opera to the last works of Puccini or Strauss. Pierre Boulez insisted, âNo opera worth discussing has been composed since Wozzeck [1922] and Lulu [1935].â7 Even Schoenbergâs Erwartung (1909) has received a vote for this dubious distinction. The justification for such claims is that in the late modern and postmodern age opera functions anachronistically, as an elaborately preserved relic of a temporally distant cultural practice. âWhereas anthropologists have to travel to the primeval forests of South America and to the islands of the Pacific to find relics of ancient social rituals,â writes philosopher Mladen Dolar, âwe merely need to go to the opera.â8
Dolar and coauthor ĆœiĆŸek associate the death of opera with the birth of psychoanalysis (hence, their vote for Erwartung). They claim that, in dramatizing ancient and modern myths, opera functioned to process and interpret the psychic underpinnings of modern man. Gary Tomlinson develops a similar thesis by tracing the âchanging picture of envoiced subjectivity in the early modern and modern Westâ through the history of opera.9 Rendered obsolete by the discoveries of Freud, Dolar argues, opera now occupies the hallowed halls of culture more as a preserved ritual than as a vital aesthetic force.
Auden makes essentially the same point, but being a true modernist he refused to surrender without a fight. His collaboration with Stravinsky only further whetted his appetite for this obsolete genre, which he compared favorably to the ancient tradition that first inspired it: âAs a period of sustained creative activity in one medium, the seventy-five-odd years of Athenian drama . . . are surpassed by the hundred and twenty-five years between Gluckâs Orpheus and Verdiâs Othello, which comprise the golden age of European opera.â10 Indeed, for Auden the operatic voice expressedâand continues to expressâthe essential force driving the modern subject:
The golden age of opera, from Mozart to Verdi, coincided with the golden age of liberal humanism, of unquestioning belief in freedom and progress. If good operas are rarer today [1951], this may be because, not only have we learned that we are less free than nineteenth-century humanism imagined, but also have become less certain that freedom is an unequivocal blessing, that the free are necessarily the good. To say that operas are more difficult to write does not mean that they are impossible. That would only follow if we should cease to believe in free-will and personality altogether. Every high C accurately struck utterly demolishes the theory that we are the irresponsible puppets of fate or chance.11
Auden meant the reference to high C literally and may have argued the same point when he talked Stravinsky into altering his original ending of Anneâs act 1 Cabaletta, shown in example 0.1. In early 1949, during his annual winter trip to New York, Stravinsky played through the completed first act for a group of close friends. Robert Craft describes the scene:
Example 0.1. Comparison of original version (a) and final version (b) of the end of Anneâs cabaletta (1.3).
We got to Sasha Schneiderâs for the Rake. Nabokov and Patricia [Blake] are already there, and Balanchine who, with Auden, follows the score over I. S.âs shoulder at the piano . . . Auden seems unaware that his violations of the strict rule of silence have irritated I. S. to an explosive degree. At the conclusion of the act, Auden asks him to change the sopranoâs final note to a high âC.â The word is wrong, I. S. says, whereupon Auden, after much âuh-uh-uhâ-ing and ânow-letâs-seeâ-ing, comes up with a new last ending in âheart.â12
Auden described the play-through to his partner and colibrettist:
I went off to the Ambassador Hotel to go through Act I. All your suggestions were conveyed and enthusiastically received; I wish you had been there to get the credit. Iâm afraid youâll have to swallow my couplet for the Cabaletta
Time cannot alter
Thy loving heart
Thy ever-loving heart.
I was faced with fitting it into the music and it was the only thing I could think up that would fit.
The performance was from the piano score with the maestro at the piano: Bob Craft, Balanchine, self etc. screaming parts.13
Enticed by operaâs connection to deeper philosophical issues, Auden with Kallman would produce four more libretti: Delia (1952), which Stravinsky declined to set; Elegy for Young Lovers (1956) and The Bassarids (1961) for Hans Werner Henze; and Loveâs Labourâs Lost (1973) for Nicolas Nabokov. Elegy has even clawed its way into the repertoire of European houses. Indeed, this expensive rite continues to attract leading composersâthe late modernist masters who have indulged themselves (Stockhausen, Ligeti, Berio, Messiaen, even Elliot Carter) would seem to outnumber those who havenâtâwhich may only testify to its lingering cachet. As with artists and performers, death seems to have enha...