Managing Quality of Life in Tourism and Hospitality

Muzaffer Uysal, M. Joseph Sirgy, Stefan Kruger, Muzaffer Uysal, M. Joseph Sirgy, Stefan Kruger

• Publisher: CAB International
• Year: 2018
• ISBN:
  9781786390479
• Topic: Business
• Subtopic: Hospitality, Travel & Tourism Industry
• Index: Business

Quality-of-life research in tourism and hospitality has gained much momentum in the past two decades. This line of research covers three main areas of focus: (i) the impacts of specific tourism and hospitality programmes on the overall quality of life of tourists/guests; (ii) the providers of goods and services; (iii) tourist communities, including the impact of different programmes and events on the quality of life of residents in these communities. Focusing on these key subjects, Managing Quality of Life in Tourism and Hospitality provides a portfolio of selected cases showing best practice and delivering them to the forefront of knowledge application, with examples in tourism and hospitality settings. Best practice case studies are included throughout, providing practical implications and lessons learned. These lessons can be applied by tourism and hospitality practitioners and community leaders, and be used to further research by academics working within tourism and hospitality.The book offers an exciting and refreshing approach to quality-of-life research in tourism and hospitality.Key features include: - Best practice and evidence-based case studies.- Broad coverage that includes tourists, industry and local communities.- International application, with material from various countries across the world.

1

Quality-of-life Research in Tourism and Hospitality

MUZAFFER UYSAL,¹* M. JOSEPH SIRGY² AND STEFAN KRUGER³

¹Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA;

²Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA; ³North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

Introduction

The enterprise of tourism and hospitality has become a major global force because of its socio-economic and development implications. The nature of tourism research for both practical and theoretical reasons embodies the interplay of such constructs as sustainability, destination competitiveness and attractiveness, and the quality of life (QoL) of stakeholders as they are impacted by tourism (Uysal and Modica, 2017). Both the explicit and implicit assumptions of tourism have always been that tourism, as an industry, provides significant benefits to its stakeholders. The nature of these benefits, tangible and intangible, vary depending on the level of destination life cycle and its infrastructure development. Tourism activities also provide benefits for those who are not necessarily part of the production and consumption system of the tourism and hospitality enterprise in the form of economic benefits (e.g. tax, investment into improved infrastructure, education and health systems) to the host communities. In recent years, there has been accelerated research examining the assumed benefits and cost of tourism on the well-being of the different stakeholders (McCabe et al., 2010; Uysal et al., 2012a, 2012b, 2015, 2016; Woo et al., 2018). This area of research in tourism is gaining momentum and is likely to receive more systematic attention in the years to come. Our scholarly research has long attempted to shed light on how to attract more visitors, how to get more people to stay at our hotels, dine at our restaurants, and influence the attitude and behaviour of our customers in general. Still, the critical research question that needs to be fully examined from both demand and supply sides of tourism is how tourism experiences relate to QoL of consumers and community residents – tourists are consumers of different tourism and hospitality goods and services at a destination, and community residents are people residing in local areas serving tourists (Jennings and Nickerson, 2006; Pearce et al., 2010).

Uysal et al. (2012b) argued that there are two models capturing the interplays of the tourism system. The first model examines the impact of tourist-related factors on the well-being of the tourist participants. The second model examines the impact of tourism-related factors on the well-being of residents of the host community and its different stakeholders, including providers of tourism goods and services. In these two nested models of the tourism system, tourists as consumers, service providers and community residents become the core components of the system, with reciprocal interactions between supply and demand. These interactions play a significant role on the total vacation experience. The models described by Uysal et al. (2012b) are helpful in understanding how the tourism system works, what benefits it has, how resources are allocated, and how marketing and management plans are developed and implemented.

QoL from the Perspective of Tourists

The first model addresses questions such as how tourists’ experiences contribute to QoL, what are the tourists’ characteristics mostly associated with tourists’ well-being, what are trip characteristics that are likely to play a significant role in tourists’ well-being, and what are the moderators and mediators involved in the abovementioned relationships (Uysal et al., 2012a). Tourism characteristics refer to factors directly affecting the tourists. Research in this area tries to uncover individual differences in the way tourism affects QoL. Trip characteristics are factors directly related to trips, and can affect QoL either directly or indirectly. Both characteristics interact and help link tourist satisfaction with particular life domains or satisfaction with life in general (Uysal et al., 2016). The main thrust of this model is incorporating tourist motivation with profile variables, QoL domains and overall QoL. Satisfaction with life domains and life overall are essentially the outcome variables. Much of the research in QoL treats QoL as the ultimate dependent variable (Sirgy, 2012). Our focus here is to identify tourism factors most likely to impact this dependent variable.

QoL from the Perspectives of Residents and Stakeholders

The second model deals with tourism research from the perspectives of host community residents. This model focuses on how residents see their living conditions (as a destination attraction) and how these living conditions impact their QoL (Uysal et al., 2012b; Woo et al., 2018). The nature of existing resources allocated for tourism also impacts community residents by influencing the economic conditions and infrastructure of the community. Community resources and infrastructure are key elements of tourism development. Thus an important research question is how to utilize and develop community resources for tourism development. Another key research question is how to manage these resources over time, once they are allocated. The answers to these questions have to involve the community stakeholders. Stakeholders are affected in different ways by tourists and therefore the challenge is to match stakeholder goals and objectives with planning and development of tourism projects. The model also takes into account the reciprocal interactions between perceived living conditions and perceived impact of tourism among community residents. Research on tourism impact has a greater focus today on sustainability issues than ever. This is an intergenerational shift of theoretical perspective, from the perspective of how we utilize resources today to a perspective of how we can use our resources carefully and sustainably. Support from community residents is quintessential in this regard. This type of research should be well grounded in behavioural, socio-economic and development theories.

Recent Studies on Different Aspects of QoL

The accumulation of knowledge as reflected in academic journals and recent books supports the notion that there is a heightened interest in the study of QoL research in tourism and hospitality. Mainstream and aligned journals in the field of tourism and hospitality have witnessed an increased number of conceptual and empirical studies examining some aspect of QoL, further attesting to the increasing popularity and importance of this line of research. QoL research in tourism and hospitality has significant practical implications for policy and decision making (e.g. Richards, 1999; Andereck and Jurowski, 2006; Moscardo, 2009; McCabe et al., 2010; McCabe et al., 2011; Croes, 2012; Deery et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2013; McCabe and Johnson, 2013; Björk, 2014; Tuo et al., 2014; Woo et al., 2015; Uysal et al., 2015; Filep et al., 2016; Uysal et al., 2016; Woo et al., 2016; Sirgy et al., 2017; Smith and Diekmann, 2017). Practitioners are becoming increasingly interested in understanding the science of QoL to help them develop better marketing and managerial policies and programmes designed to enhance QoL of their customers and employees as well as community residents.

From the perspective of tourism marketing, there is also shift away from emphasizing profit to emphasizing sustainability. The sustainability approach is a holistic, integrative view of marketing, taking into account social equity, environmental protection, and economic liveability (Jamrozy, 2007). While acknowledging the economic significance of QoL research, Sirgy and Uysal (2016) highlighted the value of such research in non-economic terms, such as QoL of a variety of stakeholders – wellness and happiness of tourists and patrons, conservation and environmental protection, well-being of host community residents, well-being of employees, to name a few. As destinations go through structural changes over time, the nature of behavioural responses of stakeholder groups to those changes also impacts management decision making and planning to mitigate possible adverse consequences arising from those changes and reinforce positive outcomes (Uysal et al., 2012a). It is now well substantiated that tourism development and activities as an economic tool have the potential to enhance and improve the liveability and amenities of communities as destinations. QoL enhancement is the direct and indirect result of tourism activities.

Recently, we have also seen some case studies and best practices dealing with some aspects of tourism QoL research that have made their way into the academic arena. Examples include:

• tourist satisfaction and subjective well-being index (Saayman et al., 2018);

• impact of festival and event attendance upon family QoL (Jepson and Stadler, 2017);

• place attachment and QoL in a national park setting (Ramkissoon et al., 2017);

• impact of festivals and events on residents’ well-being (Yolal et al., 2016);

• effects of the wellness tourism experience (Luo et al., 2017);

• leisure satisfaction of residents and quality-of-life perceptions for a fast-growing tourism destination: Macao (Liao et al., 2016);

• happiness from the perspective of positive psychology and Chinese traditional culture (Liu, 2016);

• tourism participation and improvement in self-reported health among older people (Ferrer et al., 2016);

• QoL and competitiveness within the framework of sustainability with respect to island destinations (Modica and Uysal, 2016, pp. 3–18);

• tourism area life cycle of Cuba and QoL (Beardsley, 2016);

• practice of responsible tourism and its contribution towards a better QoL in the case of the Langkawi Island communities (Hanafiah et al., 2016);

• effects of destination social responsibility on residents’ support for tourism development and QoL (Su et al., 2016);

• satisfaction with life in the context of seasonal migrants in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas (Simpson et al., 2016);

• linkages between tourism development and QoL and economic growth for the island of Aruba (Ridderstaat et al., 2016);

• the relation between pathological gamblers as compared with non-gamblers and QoL in physical health, psychological well-being, social relationships and environment life domains in the case of participants from Macao and Australia (Loo et al., 2016);

• residents’ perceived QoL in a cultural-heritage tourism destination (Jeon et al., 2016);

• holiday recovery experiences, tourism satisfaction and life satisfaction (Chen et al., 2016);

• tourism development and happiness (Rivera et al., 2016);

• how to improve QoL of residents and visitor experiences in ‘Cittaslow’ cities in Turkey (Hatipoglu, 2015);

• how participating in appreciative activities may influence life satisfaction (Bimonte and Faralla, 2015);

• enterprise growth and a good work–life relationship (Peters and Schuckert, 2014);

• QoL segmentation of youth market (Eusébio and Carneiro, 2014);

• healthy-living market segment and its motivational behaviour to spa-wellness facilities in Slovenia (Rančić et al., 2014);

• the wine festival experience on tourists’ QoL in Robertson, South Africa (Kruger et al., 2013);

• vacation and well-being: a study of Chinese tourists (Chen et al., 2013);

• leisure benefit systems and frontline employees’ QoL and work-to-leisure conflicts (Lin et al., 2013);

• alternative forms of tourism and the economics of happiness (Bimonte and Faralla, 2012);

• best practice in accessible tourism – inclusion, disability and an ageing population (Buhalis et al., 2012);

• residents’ QoL in Saudi Arabia (Khizindar, 2012);

• the effect of tourism upon QoL in Shiraz, Iran (Aref, 2011);

• segmentation of visitors b...

Table of contents

• Front Cover
• Title Page
• Copyright Page
• Contents
• Editors and Contributors
• Preface
• 1 Quality-of-life Research in Tourism and Hospitality
• 2 Flamenco, Tourists’ Experiences and the Meaningful Life
• 3 ‘To Mix with New People’: The Surprising Day Trips of Mature Germans
• 4 Creating Moments of Happiness on Day Trips
• 5 Social Tourism as Correlates of Quality of Life: The Case of Disadvantaged People
• 6 How to Make Someone Feel Welcome Somewhere, and Mean It. L’accueil Might Be the Answer
• 7 Sightseeing Tours’ Impact on Well-being and Eudaimonia
• 8 Thermal Spas, Well-being and Tourism in Budapest
• 9 Rural Well-being Tourism in Northern Europe – Providing Opportunities to Enhance Quality of Life
• 10 The Bet Is On: A Case Study of the Naudé-Potgieter Model of Casino Employees’ Happiness in the Workplace
• 11 Quality-of-life Research in Tourism and Hospitality: Implications and Future Research
• Index
• Back Cover