REFERENCES
All translations are the authorâs own unless otherwise stated.
Introduction
1 Acknowledging that âfatâ, âfatnessâ and âcorpulenceâ are imperfect solutions to the problem of stigmatizing and pathologizing terms like âobesityâ, I nevertheless follow the usage of scholars like R. Longhurst, âFat Bodies: Developing Geographical Research Agendasâ, Progress in Human Geography, XXIX/3 (2005), pp. 247â59; L. F. Monaghan, Men and the War on Obesity: A Sociological Study (London, 2008); and A. C. Saguy, Whatâs Wrong with Fat? (New York, 2013), p. 7. My occasional use of âoverweightâ is meant to convey the impressions of various periods. When it appears, âobesityâ reflects the terms of original or translated source material.
2 For example, see J. L. Fikkan and E. D. Rothblum, âIs Fat a Feminist Issue? Exploring the Gendered Nature of Weight Biasâ, Sex Roles, LXVI (2012), pp. 575â92; L. Berlant, âSlow Death (Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency)â, Critical Inquiry, XXXIII/4 (2007), pp. 754â80; S. Strings, âObese Black Women as âSocial Dead Weightâ: Reinventing the âDiseased Black Womanââ, Signs, XLI/1 (2015), pp. 107â30; V. Swami et al., âThe Attractive Female Body Weight and Female Body Dissatisfaction in 26 Countries across 10 World Regions: Results of the International Body Project Iâ, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, XXXVI/3 (2010), pp. 309â25.
3 L. Fraser, âThe Inner Corset: A Brief History of Fat in the United Statesâ, in The Fat Studies Reader, ed. E. Rothblum and S. Solovay (New York, 2009), pp. 11â14; P. Rogers, âFat Is a Fictional Issue: The Novel and the Rise of Weight-Watchingâ, in Historicizing Fat in Anglo-American Culture, ed. E. Levy-Navarro (Columbus, OH, 2010), pp. 19â39.
4 E. Levy-Navarro, The Culture of Obesity in Early and Late Modernity (Basingstoke, 2008), p. 37.
5 G. Eknoyan, âA History of Obesity, or How What Was Good Became Ugly and Then Badâ, Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, XIII/4 (2006), pp. 421â7. For a recent popular iteration of this narrative, see S. Tara, The Secret Life of Fat (New York, 2017).
6 M. Douglas, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (New York, 1966). See also Kristevaâs concept of âabjectionâ, a well-known extension of Douglasâs model. J. Kristeva, Powers of Horror, trans. L. S. Oudiez (New York, 1982). For a critique of these related accounts of âimpurityâ, see R. Duschinsky, âAbjection and Self-identity: Towards a Revised Account of Purity and Impurityâ, Sociological Review, LXI/4 (2013), pp. 709â27; and âIdeal and Unsullied: Purity, Subjectivity and Social Powerâ, Subjectivity, IV/2 (2011), pp. 147â67.
7 J. E. Braziel and K. LeBesco, eds, Bodies Out of Bounds: Fatness and Transgression (Berkeley, CA, 2001).
8 See M. Warin, âMaterial Feminism, Obesity Science and the Limits of Discursive Critiqueâ, Body and Society, XXI/4 (2015), p. 61.
9 On the importance of conceptual frames, see Saguy, Whatâs Wrong with Fat?
10 O.J.T. Harris and J. Robb, âMultiple Ontologies of the Problem of the Body in Historyâ, American Anthropologist, CXIV/4 (2012), pp. 668â79.
11 In one of the most important theoretical discussions of fat embodiment, Samantha Murray reminds us that âperception is a mode of bodily being-in-the-world that is constitutive of this being, and is not (and can never be) confined to the âvisualââ. S. Murray, The âFatâ Female Body (Basingstoke, 2008), p. 149.
12 M. M. Lelwica, Shameful Bodies: Religion and the Culture of Physical Improvement (London, 2017), p. 46. The âvisceralâ may be defined in terms of âthe sensations, moods and ways of being that emerge from our sensory engagement with the material and discursive environments in which we liveâ. R. Longhurst, L. Johnston and E. Ho, âA Visceral Approach: Cooking âat Homeâ with Migrant Women in Hamilton, New Zealandâ, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, XXXIV/3 (2009), p. 334.
13 A. E. Farrell, Fat Shame: Stigma and the Fat Body in American Culture (New York, 2011), pp. 127â30.
14 J. C. Oates, Middle Age: A Romance (New York, 2001), pp. 350â51.
15 S. Lawler, âDisgusted Subjects: The Making of Middle-class Identitiesâ, The Sociological Review, LIII/3 (2005), p. 442.
16 R. M. Puhl and C. A. Heuer, âThe Stigma of Obesity: A Review and Updateâ, Obesity, XVII/5 (2009), pp. 941â64.
17 P. Campos, The Obesity Myth: Why Americaâs Obsession with Weight Is Hazardous to Your Health (New York, 2004), p. xxiv; see also p. 67. On the role of emotion in responses to fatness, see also A. Phillipson, âRe-reading âLipoliteracyâ: Putting Emotions to Work in Fat Studies Scholarshipâ, Fat Studies, II/1 (2013), pp. 70â86.
18 C. S. Crandall, A. Nierman and M. Hebl, âAnti-fat Prejudiceâ, in Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination, ed. T. D. Nelson (New York, 2009), pp. 469â87; C. S. Crandall, âPrejudice against Fat People: Ideology and Self-interestâ, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, LXVI/5 (1994), pp. 882â94.
19 M. Nussbaum, Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law (Princeton, NJ, 2004), p. 92. See also C. E. Forth, âFat and Disgust; or, The Problem of âLife in the Wrong Placeââ, in Le DĂ©goĂ»t: Histoire, langage, politique et esthĂ©tique dâune Ă©motion plurielle, ed. M. Delville, A. Norris and V. von Hoffmann (LiĂšge, 2015), pp. 41â60. When certain âvisual sensationsâ seem to provoke disgust,...