NOT FAR INTO MY FIRST YEAR of seminary, I began to wonder whether I would make it after all. The four-year program had already begun to feel like a marathonâand Iâm not a runner.
I was earning a master of divinity degree, which would equip me to receive a call to a church and be ordained as a minister of word and sacrament in the Presbyterian Church (USA). Every part of seminary, from the heady subject matter and interminable readings to the demanding internships, felt all-consuming. Seminary seemed designed to consume us, or at least to consume every sure thing we brought with us: the childhood beliefs, the rote creeds, the heartfelt but unexamined convictions. These had to be examined and dismantled so that new beliefs could be constructed. By graduation, we would have presumably mastered the divine.
Judy, an older friend who had graduated and received a call to a ministry position, invited me to her ordination. I attended to see what it looked like to cross the finish line. The service took place on a Sunday evening in a beautiful, old church in a Minneapolis neighborhood. The vaulted sanctuary had long, curving pews in dark wood and a sloping floor. Organ music reverberated as a half-dozen participants dressed in black robes and colorful stoles proceeded down the center aisle. The service brimmed with songs, Scripture, and solemn vows in a mood both festive and serious. I drank it in. A seminary graduation confers a diploma, a sheepskin, but ordination confers a status, the standing of shepherd. My classmate would no longer be just Judy but reverend.
The pursuit of that titleâat the time a forbidden status for womenâhad brought me to seminary. The Christian Reformed Church, the church of my childhood, barred women from entering ministry.1 I felt this as a deeply personal affront. To my Dutch forebears, the fact that I was female meant ordination was verboten. That I felt the call of God did not matter. Whether I was smart enough, skilled enough, or disciplined enough was irrelevant. The door was shut. So I enrolled at a more liberal seminary. My professors were welcoming, but I encountered internal barriers: Who was I fooling? I didnât deserve to be here. I would never make it.
That evening at my friendâs ordination, my whirling emotions found an anchor in the black pulpit robe presented to her as a gift. Judy would don it officially for the first time after the laying on of hands to signify that she had become Reverend Rhodes. I knew that some pastors wore such robes, but not in my tradition, where preachers wore dark suits and white shirts, the conservative attire of powerful men. A pulpit robe struck me as outdated and ungainly. Even ridiculous. A preacher couldnât so much as fill a water glass without those flapping sleeves getting wet. How nerve-racking to walk up chancel steps with all that cloth fluttering around your feet. But for all those limitationsâmaybe because of themâthe robe declared its power. It was not designed to be handy, or useful, or particularly beautiful. It was designed to convey that the wearer had entered a rarefied profession, adding power and authority to the preaching of the Word.
The ordination service was nearing its climax. Judy knelt and the black-robed participants clustered around her, each laying a hand on her head and shoulders. An authority figure prayed for the Spirit to descend upon her. Watching, I felt a flood of awe, a frisson of fear. Power was present, undeniablyâbut also danger.
To me, the ordination felt as mysterious as the practice of alchemy. An ordinary mortal had been transformed into a minister before my eyes. It didnât occur to me thenâor for decades afterwardâthat the ritual of ordination might be considered, in some sense, a way of joining the patriarchy, of donning the power of a certain status.
PATRIARCHY
I was five years old in 1963, the year Betty Friedan published her seminal work The Feminine Mystique. What she called âthe problem that has no nameâ2 described the shared female experience of being less than men, of being given a very limited role to occupy. Friedanâs work spurred women to become conscious of patriarchy. Seven years later, Robin Morgan edited an anthology of radical feminist writings that included the voices of women of color titled Sisterhood Is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Womenâs Liberation Movement.3 Morganâs work highlighted the systemic nature of womenâs oppression in the workplace and political system. This not only raised consciousness but also called people to push back against patriarchy.
Loosely defined, the word patriarchy refers to laws that keep males in power, ranging across systems of governance in the nation, state, business, church, and family. Across the millennia, menâs legal rightsâto vote, hold office, own a business, buy property, and pass property on to male heirsâensured that men had access to power that women lacked. Patriarchal laws also ensured that white men had access to power that men of color lacked, creating the racial disparities that afflict America today. Since the fruit of patriarchy is injustice, patriarchy is sinful.
Included in patriarchy are traditions and norms that donât carry the force of law but rely on longstanding habit and common practice. These often linger longer than laws. Examples are a wife taking her husbandâs name, a husband expecting his wife to shoulder the housework, or referring to a fatherâs portion of childcare as âbabysitting.â
Patriarchal laws and norms descended from antiquity, so they color the stories we read in Scripture. These âbiblical normsâ are often used to defend todayâs patriarchal norms. Certainly, they shaped the way I was raised. To be a âgood girlâ meant being silent, docile, and obedient. In my home, church, and private Christian school, it was assumed that males would wield the power. After all, the pattern of male dominance and female compliance was dictated by Scripture.
SETTING THE STAGE: TAMARâS STORY
If it didnât involve incest in a royal family, the story of Tamar in 2 Samuel 13 would seem commonplace: a powerful man targets a beautiful woman, deceives her, traps her, overpowers her, sexually assaults her, and then casts her aside as worthless. Had Tamar been a nameless woman, her story would have been lost to history, as so many others undoubtedly have been.
But Tamar is the daughter of David, a towering biblical figure, the shepherd boy who killed the giant Goliath with a slingshot and was anointed king. Because of her proximity to the throne, Tamarâs story is riddled with palace intrigue. Amnon, her assailant, is also her half-brother and first in line to Davidâs throne. Absalom, her ârescuer,â is her full brother and second in line to the throne. When Absalom avenged Tamarâs assault, years later, his action not only altered the line of succession but made him king. This is probably the reason Scripture records the story.
Even though Tamar has the power of a royal name, the story of her rape ends up being less about her and more about her brothers vying for power. These dynamicsâboth of power and vulnerabilityâare captured in a rare textual detail about her clothing, a âlong robe with sleeves; for this is how the virgin daughters of the king were clothedâ (2 Samuel 13:18). Itâs fitting that Tamar laments her assault by tearing the robe that defines her place.
SETTING THE STAGE: MY STORY
When I graduated from seminary, my husband, Doug, was finishing his teaching credentials, our daughter was a toddler, and I was pregnant with number two. As soon as our second daughter was born, I called the headquarters of the Presbyterian Church (USA) and requested the list of churches with open positions. While my infant nursed I pored through the computer printouts. Each listing contained a possible new future.
Doug and I were more than ready to become professionals and leave our student juggling act behind. For years, we had passed everything back and forth between us like a four-handed circus performance: three part-time jobs, two sets of professional coursework, and one rattletrap carânot to mention taking care of our daughters. We dreamed of the day our family would be settled in a place where he could teach and I could preach. I purposely cast a wide net of applications, feeling excited to entertain a dozen dreams at once. Wherever God called us, we would go.
When our baby was eight months old, a call came from a thriving church in upstate New York, a thousand miles east of our home in Minneapolis. Penfield Presbyterian Church was located in a wealthy suburb of Rochester. I would be the associate pastor in charge of programs for children, youth, and families (which struck me as pretty much everyone). The executive presbyter told me that the position was a âplum.â In fact, I would be the first female to serve this prestigious church. Doug and I were ecstatic and deeply grateful to God.
Still, we felt a sense of shock at how quickly the change would unfold and how complicated the logistics would be. We needed to sell our ramshackle houseâan old Victorian that cost less than a BMWâand buy one in our new community. We quickly realized that housing prices in Penfield were completely out of our range. We would need two incomes, which meant finding a full-time job for Doug and full-time care for our two daughters.
The churchâs senior pastor, Reverend Zane Bolinger, phoned. Appearing to be helpful, he volunteered to plan my ordination service and the reception to follow. As he said, it was one chore he could take off my plate. Bolinger was a long-time pastor, beloved by his congregation. At sixty-two years old, he was twice my age and had recently been widowed. I felt honored that he offered to preach the ordination sermon. I knew that when I knelt for the moment of ordination, he would be the first to lay his hands on my head. I felt thrilled in anticipation of that holy moment.
I couldnât possibly have known that in a yearâs time Bolinger would lay his hands on me again, with unholy intentions.
THE TRAP IS LAID: TAMARâS STORY
In 2 Samuel 13, the text uses the phrase âfell in loveâ to describe how Amnon lusted after his half-sister Tamar: âDavidâs son Absalom had a beautiful sister whose name was Tamar; and Davidâs son Amnon fell in love with her. Amnon was so tormented that he made himself ill because of his sister Tamar, for she was a virgin and it seemed impossible to Amnon to do anything to herâ (2 Samuel 13:1-2).
Ancient texts use euphemisms too. Amnon âfell in loveâ and could not âdo anythingâ to Tamar. But look! Help is on the horizon: âAmnon had a friend whose name was Jonadab, the son of Davidâs brother Shimeah; and Jonadab was a very crafty man. He said to him, âO son of the king, why are you so haggard morning after morning? Will you not tell me?ââ (2 Samuel 13:3-4).
Can you hear cousin Jonadabâs ingratiating tone? âO son of the king!â In other words, âO, you important man! You are not like other men!â Schemers have always orbited the powerful. Whether theyâre tangential relatives, hangers-on, or opportunists, they know how to give influential men their heartâs desire. Jonadab is the cunning type willing to offer up a womanâs body to advance his own agenda.
The ruse that Jonadab concocts is wonderfully simple. Amnon could pretend to be sick. His appetite is gone, but it might be tempted with one of his sisterâs special recipes. Those steamed dumplings! Those are his favorite.
As Jonadab anticipated, David orders Tamar to Amnonâs house to cook for him. Tamar cannot refuse the kingâs order, even if she suspects that she is being summoned to satisfy other appetites. Obediently, she prepares the dumplings and sets them before Amnon. He will not eat. He clears the room and orders Tamar to bring the food into his bedchamber. Is she wary about what will happen next? She does as sheâs told and the door closes behind her.
THE TRAP IS LAID: MY STORY
Before we moved, Doug was told he could secure a teaching job with his credentials, but he soon discovered that the local schools required a masterâs degree, which would require another full year of classes. After a long talk we decided it made sense for him to stay home and take care of our daughters full time, at least for this season. We would have to live off my salary, which was the minimum allowed by the denomination. We thought we could scrape by since we were used to living a simple student l...