This is a test
- 168 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
This book is a history of money in America and a discussion of its moral, political, and theological significance from the time of Daniel Defoe and Cotton Mather to the present.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access God and Mammon by Lance Morrow in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Volkswirtschaftslehre & Wirtschaftsgeschichte. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Publisher
Encounter BooksISBN
9781641770972
Subtopic
Wirtschaftsgeschichte1
Thales of Miletus, the pre-Socratic Greek philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician, conceived that the earth is a flat disk floating on an infinite sea, and that the beginning of all things was water.
His student Anaximenes disagreed. He said the beginning of all things was air.
How did America begin? What was its primordial element?
I think it was money.
It was the desire for money. Money, broadly speaking, has been the logic of America: its mystique and raison dâĂȘtre. It was the hope of moneyâthe fantasy of it, the greed for itâthat drew Europeans across the water. It was the ambition for money that sustained America and made it the richest and most powerful among the nations of the earthâalthough not the happiest. It was in the pursuit of money that Europeansâand other immigrants who followed onâsubdued and overwhelmed the earlier continent and superimposed the America that we see now.
And it was because of moneyâexorbitant taxationâthat the American colonists rebelled and demanded independence.
Money is an indelicate explanation of America, perhaps, but the truest oneâor, anyway, the most intelligent starting point.
Other forces were at work as wellâreligious motives touched here and there by fanaticism; Bible stories still resonant, not yet obscure; remnants of Greece and Rome; the Enlightenment; ethnic traditions, darker tribal urges; geography, vast spaces opening westward; climate, which was on the whole seasonal, familiar, and nicely middling; firearms; technology; alcohol; the genius for tinkering.
But money, for better or worse, was the American protagonist, center stageâhero or villain. By and by, you had the Malefactors of Great Wealth and Horatio Algerâs beamish boys. Race and religionâthough each of them was very powerful, with deeper resonances than anything so crass and disreputable as moneyâwere supporting actors. Wealth was the American star.
Money was not, technically, everything. But it was a great deal.
For the sake of simplicityâand for the sake of entertainment, too, since money is an entertaining subjectâIâd like to suspend complexity and reduce everything, for a moment, to this one fundamental: money as the American thing.
Alexis de Tocqueville is my witness: âOne usually finds that love of money is either the chief or a secondary motive at the bottom of everything the Americans doâŠ. It agitates their minds but disciplines their lives.â
Money became freedomâs business partner, the demiurge of the entrepreneurial middle class that founded the country. Money was the American Shinto.
The New World was, in the words of another Frenchman, Hector Saint John de CrĂšvecoeur, âune feuille blanche,â or a blank pageâa fresh beginning of history, a story liberated from the old worldâs plot-lines, the worn grooves of centuries. The Puritans came on âan errand into the wildernessââa religious missionâbut soon they set about clearing that wilderness, chopping down trees and selling the timber, and planting wheat, and digging for coal and iron and copper and silver and gold, and putting in railroads and great cities. Money took over as the organizing principleânot religion or birth, class or custom. Money found its apotheosis.
The country was abundant, hospitable, dangerous, and usually heartlessâjust as money is inclined to be: ruthless until it develops a conscience and goes in for Improvement. CrĂšvecoeurâs New Man had unprecedented mobility. The newcomer might shed the old self and disappear into America and grow a new self. The New World was far enough away to sever the ties with Europeâs still feudalistic restrictions. Money became the idiom of freedom and its partner, rapacity. Itâs here that we encounter the paradox of the freedom to enslave. The signature American melodrama of race originated in moneyâin the economics of sugar, molasses, rice, tobacco, indigo, cotton, and kidnapped black African labor.
That laborâreferring to the African slavesâbecame an object, became property and commodity, and even became a medium of exchange. An entry in Encyclopaedia Britannica would report: âScores, perhaps hundreds of different objects have served as money at one time or another, including such things as slaves, gunpowder and the jawbones of pigs.â Objects! Such things! The three mediums of exchange seemed to summarize an underthread of American history: slaves, gunpowder, the jawbones of pigs.
The booster spoke of âthe fruited plain.â The bitter realist said, âRoot, hog, or die.â The elegiac intellectual turned away from the spectacle in disgust.
You canât go wrong, in any case, if you think about America in terms of binaries, twinsâcontradictions that collaborate in the national scheme of things, like positive and negative charges of electricity. America was always to have an aspect of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, of God and Mammon, of innocence and sin.
This study approaches the partnership of God and Mammon in both its historical and contemporary dimensionsâon the vertical and the horizontal axes, as it were. The vertical axis is American history. The horizontal axis follows events in the extraordinary year 2020. The two dimensions take turns in the narrative.
The triumphs of American money have been great. I talk also about its failures and limitationsâand about values that lie beyond moneyâs capacity to measure, meanings that cannot be grasped in moneyâs language.
And the book is about a theological errorâan evil, slaveryâintroduced an eon ago, when America was a garden, and about how to evaluate that long-ago sin and its effect upon the country now.
In 2020, in the midst of a pandemic, America would accuse itself bitterly on the subject of raceâwould beat its breast in paroxysms of self-hatred, of ostentatious remorse.
We encounter more binaries.
What if the narrative of a sinful and uniquely racist 21st-century America was wrong? Is it not a fallacy and a wild exaggerationâFake Newsâto proceed on the premise that the lives of black Americans of the 21st century are indistinguishable in their afflictions from the lives of their great-great-great-great-great-grandparents? Has not America, over many years, succeeded in helping African Americans to achieve what areâby any standard in any country in the worldâremarkable levels of prosperity, education, citizenship, and political power? What if the paroxysms of 2020 represent not truth telling but error? What if they amount merely to a wanton assault upon the country at a moment when it is suffering and vulnerable?
In 1702, Cotton Mather preached that the Christian must row to heaven with two oarsâthe oar of his spiritual calling and the oar of his material calling. If he pulls on only one of them, the boat goes in circles and the Christian can never reach the safe harbor of salvation.
The idea of the two oars, accommodating Puritan theology to commercial practice, would eventually become the national doctrine. It was not enough for Americans to do well; in theory, they must also do good, and be good. By âbe good,â I do not mean merely that they must behave themselves; I mean that they must strive to be virtuous in the demanding sight of God. They must justify Americaâs great fortuneâand find some deeper purpose for it.
American Virtue would ask: âBut what of race? Can a people be good if they enslave fellow creatures who are fashioned in the image of God and share in the divinity bestowed on the slave ownerâor three-fifths of it, anyway? Could the slave owners ever have been virtuous? Did God look the other way while this was going on? Did his justice sleep? If America was so good, how could it be so evil?â
Mammon would look up in irritation and reply: âThat was all a long time ago. Things happened between then and nowâa Civil War, for example, and the thorough and transforming civil rights acts of the 1960s. Anyway, to be less parochial in our perspective, slavery has been around, in most parts of the world, foreverâsince the beginning of human cruelty and greed and power. Beware of sanctimony. If you wish to speak about Africa, catching people and holding them in brutal servitude was the way of the chiefs long before the white man came. Beware of naĂŻve perfectionism. Beware of anachronism, of self-righteousness. Beware of getting drunk on indignation. Thereâs a good fellow.â
Cotton Mather published his Magnalia Christi Americana [Christâs Great Deeds in America]: The Ecclesiastical History of New-England from Its First Planting in the Year 1620, until the Year of Our Lord 1698. He traced the rapid evolution of New England from the austere and punitive piety of the first settlement to middle-class prosperity and the beginnings of American abundance, with a glimpse, farther off on the horizon, of the fortunes that would emerge, for example, from whaling and the China trade.
Mather fretted that money had already gotten the upper hand. He wrote: âReligion brought forth prosperity, and the daughter destroyed the motherâŠ. [T]here is danger lest the enchantments of this world make [the colonists] forget their errand into the wilderness.â
But Mather committed the matricide that he condemned. He rhapsodized about the American profusionâas evidence of Godâs grace and ingenuityâand yet captured and assigned a price, for example, to the innumerable passenger pigeons that profligate Americans would, in time, cause to become extinct:
I will add a Curiosity relating to the Pidgeons, which annually visit my own Country in their seasons, in such incredible numbers, that they have commonly been sold for Two-pence a dozen; yea, one Man has at one time surprized no less than two hundred dozen in his Barn, into which they have come for Food, and by shutting the door, he has had them all.
And so it came to pass. The daughter slew the mother. The enchantment of money overpowered religious zeal, gentrified it, and confined it to the Sabbathâceding to piety one-seventh of the week and giving over the other days to Mammon.
The riches of America in this world would outshine the promised glory of the next. The busy, gaudy, dangerous actuality of America, once it got its economy organized, would prove more absorbing than the promise of eternity. Here was the secularized fulfillment of Godâs promise, the rainbow and the pot of gold at the end of it. Boastful, prideful America would learn to think of itself as the next best thing to heavenâeschatology without doom.
Moneyâbeing so flexible and adaptable to all particular needs and storiesâwas the star of the promise and the vehicle of its fulfillment. In 1925, President Calvin Coolidge, whose ancestors included passengers on the Mayflower and defendants in the Salem witch trials, told the National Association of Newspaper Editors: âAfter all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world.â
So it was that moneyâworking soft, seductive erosions, caressing the original theologyâwould resolve the estrangement between Calvinism and the Enlightenment. The American prosperity would, in time, bring forth Thomas Jeffersonâs spacious trinity âLife, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.â Jonathan Edwardâs âangry Godâ ascended into the upper air of Deismâin the same way, as it were, that in Indiaâs hot months the British Raj withdrew to cool itself in the foothills of the Himalayas, at Simla.
Happiness could be simplified to mean money and what it could buy. It was assumed that life and liberty would, in the natural course of things, lead on to happiness. Moneyâalthough a temperamental thing, subject to violent mood swingsâwas the energy on which the American Dream would proceed down the years. Money and the Constitution were the two indispensable tools in the advance of American civilization.
By the time the Christian urgencies waned and America became more diverse and secular, the pretension to virtue had embedded itself as an item of national pride and patriotic vanity, even as the process of money-getting continued in its eager, acquisitive, and Mammonish ways. This went on until, in the Gilded Age after the Civil War, money performed a garish mutation and became colossal. America commenced being a superpower.
Whatever its worldly guise, the essence of the American idea remained very much as it was in Cotton Matherâs image of two oars: to reconcile God and Mammonâeven to set them up as partners in the rowing toward heaven. Alter the metaphor: Church and state may have been legally separated by the First Amendment, but virtue and money have had a long, quarrelsome, indissoluble marriage, so to speakâone marked by hypocrisy, chronic infidelity, and, at the same time, some remarkably admirable results.
MoneyâI mean, inequality as to who has money and who does notâbecame one of the countryâs two permanent moral dilemmas. The other is race. The two conundrums were bound up with each other. Some of the great fortunes emerged from the slave trade. Newport, Rhode Island, with its magnificent âcottagesâ of the rich of the Gilded Age, was in an earlier time founded, to a significant degree, by money earned in the African slave trade. Balzac wrote in PĂ©re Goriot: âLe secret des grandes fortunes sans cause apparente est un crime oubliĂ©, parce quâil a Ă©tĂ© proprement fait.â The thought would be rendered more simply thus: âBehind every great fortune, there is a great crime.â
The descendants of slaves were among the poorest, the ones without money. There was always trouble when Americans tried to reconcile their materialism with their theology. I will write about the Brown brothers, Moses and John, of the wealthy Rhode Island merchant family who gave its name to Brown University. Moses was an abolitionist. John was active in the African slave trade. Somehow the two brothers managed to remain brotherly and proceed with their enterprises, even as they conducted one of the earliest and bitterest of arguments about whether American virtue could be squared with the buying and selling of human beings.
Race in America began as a drama of money, originating in the economics of cotton, tobacco, sugar, rum, and the Middle Passage.
A key American story, Huckleberry Finn, contains this sardonic riff: The runaway Jim has a happy moment when he reasons that, as a slave, he would fetch $800 on the market, and, in consequence, being now fled from bondage and at liberty, he will be a rich man! He rejoices to find that he is worth $800.
American history here and there indulges in a sly play of coincidences. We find two antithetical John Browns in the American scheme, for exampleâthe slave merchant of Providence and his antiself, the wild abolitionist martyr of Harperâs Ferry. In 1954, Earl Warrenâs Supreme Court would endâor try to endâthe racial segregation of American public schools in its ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. And there was the Brown Brothersâ slave ship called Sally, which made a disastrous voyage to the Windward Coast of Africa in 1764 (more than half the slaves perished in the Middle Passage, some of them killed in an abortive rebellion on the high seas) that would precipitate the tremendous moral debate between the slaver John Brown and the abolitionist Moses BrownâGod and Mammon wrestling each other for years in the New England conscience. The slave ship Sally would become a sort of premonition of Sally Hemings, the half-sister of Thomas Jeffersonâs dead wife, MarthaâSally was one of Jeffersonâs ...
Table of contents
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Contents
- Chapter 1
- Chapter 2
- Chapter 3
- Chapter 4
- Chapter 5
- Chapter 6
- Chapter 7
- Chapter 8
- Chapter 9
- Chapter 10
- Chapter 11
- Chapter 12
- Chapter 13
- Chapter 14
- Chapter 15
- Chapter 16
- Chapter 17
- Chapter 18
- Chapter 19
- Chapter 20
- Chapter 21
- Chapter 22
- Chapter 23
- Chapter 24
- Epilogue
- Acknowledgments