Technology as a Driver for Innovation and Change
Over the past 20 to 30 years the work environment in architecture, engineering, and construction practices has become ever more information-rich, allowing for novel approaches to conceiving and delivering the projects we undertake. Speaking about BIM at the 2005 AIA Convention in Las Vegas, Thom Mayne, head of the renown U.S. architecture firm Morphosis, predicted: “You need to prepare yourself for a profession that you're not going to recognize a decade from now, that the next generation is going to occupy.” Mayne adds to this by highlighting the potential of the use of information and communication technology to enrich design and construction processes: “There exists a new medium, a continuity, a flow of thinking, a design methodology which is more cohesive from the first generative idea, through construction, coordinating millions of bits of discrete data.”1
New technology and associated tools possess a transformative character that impacts on the entire supply chain and the business models of how major stakeholders interact on construction projects. Digital Innovation promotes organizational change in design practice as well as across construction and procurement.2 The management of information and communication technology (ICT) has therefore become an ever more relevant aspect of contemporary practice. Some argue that there is a direct relationship between the progressing specialization in the construction industry, the increased application of technology, and the complexity of contemporary construction projects.3
Since the introduction of CAD to mainstream practice, management of ICT was predominantly handled by an organization's Information Technology (IT) expert or department. A separation between IT and design/engineering activities within an organization was the norm and the IT department remained in a supporting role. The IT expert would set up and maintain an organization's hardware and network infrastructure, the software environment for communication and design/engineering/documentation. The increasing application of BIM comes with a new distribution of responsibilities: The veracity inherent in the changes triggered by BIM stem from the disruptive nature associated with its core concept. BIM addresses whole-of-life of building projects. Its use opens up channels for communicating and exchanging building information across a group of stakeholders who previously adhered to a predominantly one-directional process of passing on information throughout the supply chain. Apart from a few exceptions, these stakeholders focused on their own piece of the puzzle without much thought to integrating lifecycle considerations into their planning.
The technology surrounding BIM is changing that view. Increased interoperability facilitates increased potential for exchanging information across a broader group of stakeholders. In the second decade of this century we increasingly analyze and respond to how to work our way backwards through the supply chain from Operation and Maintenance (O&M), to Construction, Engineering, Design, Feasibility, and Building Component Manufacturing (eventually closing the loop with the operational side). On a project level, information inherent in these processes requires management and the modeling and coordination processes require strong guidance from those who provide the most direct interface between the technology and organizational culture. This change in process signifies a major cultural shift in the way humans interact on projects both across organizations as well as within their own team. On a multidisciplinary project level such interaction increasingly gets regulated by BIM Execution Plans and other guidelines. One key challenge emerges if conflicts surface due to tensions between the team's goals and the legal framework by which they are bound. Within individual organizations tensions arise due to varying levels of engagement of staff with technology, the associated range of skills, and varying levels of resistance to accommodating change to well-established workflows. In addition, an organization's leadership is not always aware o...