![RSM Simplified](https://img.perlego.com/book-covers/1575775/9781315351728_300_450.webp)
eBook - ePub
RSM Simplified
Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments, Second Edition
Mark J. Anderson, Patrick J. Whitcomb
This is a test
- 297 pages
- English
- ePUB (adapté aux mobiles)
- Disponible sur iOS et Android
eBook - ePub
RSM Simplified
Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments, Second Edition
Mark J. Anderson, Patrick J. Whitcomb
DĂ©tails du livre
Aperçu du livre
Table des matiĂšres
Citations
Ă propos de ce livre
This book continues where DOE Simplified leaves off in Chapter 8 with an introduction to "Response Surface Methods [RSM] for Optimization." It presents this advanced tool for design of experiments (DOE) in a way that anyone with a minimum of technical training can understand and appreciate. Unlike any other book of its kind, RSM Simplified keeps formulas to a minimumâmaking liberal use of figures, charts, graphs and checklists. It also offers many relevant examples, amusing and fun do-it-yourself exercises.
Foire aux questions
Comment puis-je résilier mon abonnement ?
Il vous suffit de vous rendre dans la section compte dans paramĂštres et de cliquer sur « RĂ©silier lâabonnement ». Câest aussi simple que cela ! Une fois que vous aurez rĂ©siliĂ© votre abonnement, il restera actif pour le reste de la pĂ©riode pour laquelle vous avez payĂ©. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Puis-je / comment puis-je télécharger des livres ?
Pour le moment, tous nos livres en format ePub adaptĂ©s aux mobiles peuvent ĂȘtre tĂ©lĂ©chargĂ©s via lâapplication. La plupart de nos PDF sont Ă©galement disponibles en tĂ©lĂ©chargement et les autres seront tĂ©lĂ©chargeables trĂšs prochainement. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Quelle est la différence entre les formules tarifaires ?
Les deux abonnements vous donnent un accĂšs complet Ă la bibliothĂšque et Ă toutes les fonctionnalitĂ©s de Perlego. Les seules diffĂ©rences sont les tarifs ainsi que la pĂ©riode dâabonnement : avec lâabonnement annuel, vous Ă©conomiserez environ 30 % par rapport Ă 12 mois dâabonnement mensuel.
Quâest-ce que Perlego ?
Nous sommes un service dâabonnement Ă des ouvrages universitaires en ligne, oĂč vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă toute une bibliothĂšque pour un prix infĂ©rieur Ă celui dâun seul livre par mois. Avec plus dâun million de livres sur plus de 1 000 sujets, nous avons ce quâil vous faut ! DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Prenez-vous en charge la synthÚse vocale ?
Recherchez le symbole Ăcouter sur votre prochain livre pour voir si vous pouvez lâĂ©couter. Lâoutil Ăcouter lit le texte Ă haute voix pour vous, en surlignant le passage qui est en cours de lecture. Vous pouvez le mettre sur pause, lâaccĂ©lĂ©rer ou le ralentir. DĂ©couvrez-en plus ici.
Est-ce que RSM Simplified est un PDF/ePUB en ligne ?
Oui, vous pouvez accĂ©der Ă RSM Simplified par Mark J. Anderson, Patrick J. Whitcomb en format PDF et/ou ePUB ainsi quâĂ dâautres livres populaires dans Betriebswirtschaft et Business allgemein. Nous disposons de plus dâun million dâouvrages Ă dĂ©couvrir dans notre catalogue.
Informations
Chapter 1
Introduction to the Beauty of Response Surface Methods
For a research worker, the unforgotten moments of his [or her] life are those rare ones, which come after years of plodding work, when the veil over natureâs secret seems suddenly to lift, and when what was dark and chaotic appears in a clear and beautiful light and pattern.
Gerty Cori
The first American woman to win a Nobel Prize in science
Before we jump down to ground-level details on response surface methods (RSM), letâs get a birdâs-eye view of the lay of the land. First of all, we will assume that you have an interest in this topic from a practical perspective, not academic. A second big assumption is that youâve mastered the simpler tools of design of experiments (DOE). (Donât worry, we will do some review in the next few chapters!)
RSM offer DOE tools that lead to peak process performance. RSM produce precise maps based on mathematical models. This methodology facilitates putting all your responses together via sophisticated optimization approaches, which ultimately lead to the discovery of sweet spots where you meet all specifications at minimal cost.
This answers the question: Whatâs in it for me? Now letâs see how RSM fits into the overall framework of DOE and learn some historical background.
Strategy of Experimentation: Role for RSM
The development of RSM began with the publication of a landmark article by Box and Wilson (1951) titled âOn the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions.â In a retrospective of events leading up to this paper, Box (2000) recalled observing process improvement teams in the United Kingdom at Imperial Chemical Industries in the late 1940s. He and Wilson realized that, as a practical matter, statistical plans for experimentation must be very flexible and allow for a series of iterations.
Box and other industrial statisticians, notably Hunter (1958â1959) continued to hone the strategy of experimentation to the point where it became standard practice in chemical and other process industries in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. In the United States, Du Pont took the lead in making effective use of the tools of DOE, including RSM. Via their Management and Technology Center (sadly, now defunct), they took an in-house workshop called âStrategy of Experimentationâ public and, over the last quarter of the twentieth century, trained legions of engineers, scientists, and quality professionals in these statistical methods for experimentation.
This now-proven strategy of experimentation, illustrated in Figure 1.1, begins with standard two-level fractional factorial design, mathematically described as â2kâpâ (Box and Hunter, 1961) or newer test plans with minimum runs (noted below), which provide a screening tool. During this phase, experimenters seek to discover the vital few factors that create statistically significant effects of practical importance for the goal of process improvement. To save time at this early stage where a number (k) of unknown factors must be quickly screened, the strategy calls for use of relatively low-resolution (âresâ) fractions (p).
A QUICK PRIMER ON NOTATION AND TERMINOLOGY FOR STANDARD SCREENING DESIGNS
Two-level DOEs work very well as screening tools. If performed properly, they can reveal the vital few factors that significantly affect your process. To save on costly runs, experimenters often perform only a fraction of all the possible combinations. There are many varieties of fractional two-level designs, such as Taguchi or PlackettâBurman, but we will restrict our discussion to the standard ones that statisticians symbolize as â2kâp,â where k refers to the number of factors and p is the degree of fractionation. Regardless of how you do it, cutting out runs reduces the ability of the design to resolve all possible effects, specifically the higher-order interactions. Minimal-run designs, such as seven factors in eight runs (27â4)âa 1/16th (2â4) fraction, can only estimate main effects. Statisticians label these low-quality designs as âresolution IIIâ to indicate that main effects will be aliased with two-factor interactions (2FIs). Resolution III designs can produce significant improvements, but itâs like kicking your PC (or slapping your laptop) to make it work: you wonât discover what really caused the failure.
To help you grasp the concept of resolution, think of main effects as one factor and add this to the number of factors it will be aliased with. In resolution III, itâs a 1-to-2 relation, which adds to 3. Resolution IV indicates a 1-to-3 aliasing (1 + 3 = 4). A resolution V design aliases main effects only with four factors (1 + 4 = 5).
Because of their ability to more clearly reveal main effects, resolution IV designs work much better than resolution III for screening purposes, but they still offer a large savings in experimental runs. For example, letâs say that you want to screen 10 process factors (k = 10). A full two-level factorial requires 210 (2k) combinations, way too many (1024!) for a practical experiment. However, the catalog of standard two-level designs offers a 1/32nd fraction thatâs resolution IV, which will produce fairly clear estimates of main effects. To most efficiently describe this option mathematically, convert the fraction to 2p (p = 5) scientific notation: 2â5 (=1/25 = 1/(2 Ă 2 Ă 2 Ă 2 Ă 2) = 1/32). This yields 210â5 (2kâp) and by simple arithmetic in the exponent (10 â 5): 25 runs. Now, we do the final calculation: 2 Ă 2 Ă 2 Ă 2 Ă 2 equals 32 runs in the resolution IV fraction (vs. 1024 in the full factorial).
P.S. A more efficient type of fractional two-level factorial screening design has been developed (Anderson and Whitcomb, 2004). These designs are referred to as âminimum-run resolution IVâ (MR4) because they require a minimal number of factor combinations (runs) to resolve main effects from 2FIs (resolution IV). They compare favorably to the classical alternatives on the basis of required experimental runs. For example, 10 factors can be screened in only 20 runs via the MR4 whereas the standard (2kâp) resolution IV design, a 1/32nd (2â5) fraction, requires 32 runs.
Along these same lines are minimum-run resolution V (MR5) designs, for example, one that characterizes six factors in only 22 runs versus 32 runs required by the standard test plan.
![Image](https://book-extracts.perlego.com/1575775/images/fig1_1-plgo-compressed.webp)
Figure 1.1 Strategy of experimentationStrategy of experimentation.
After throwing the many trivial factors off to the side (preferably by holding them fixed or blocking them out), the experimental program should enter the characterization phase where interactions become evident. This requires higher-resolution, or possibly full, two-level factorial designs. By definition, traditional one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) approaches will never uncover interactions of factors that of...
Table des matiĂšres
- Cover
- Half Title
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Table of Contents
- Preface
- Authors
- 1 Introduction to the Beauty of Response Surface Methods
- 2 Lessons to Learn from Happenstance Regression
- 3 Factorials to Set the Stage for More Glamorous RSM Designs
- 4 Central Composite Design: Stars AddedâRSM Show Begins
- 5 Three-Level Designs
- 6 Finding Your Sweet Spot for Multiple Responses
- 7 Computer-Generated Optimal Designs
- 8 Everything You Should Know about CCDs (but Dare Not Ask!)
- 9 RSM for Six Sigma
- 10 Other Applications for RSM
- 11 Applying RSM to Mixtures
- 12 Practical Aspects for RSM Success
- Glossary
- References
- Index
- About the Software
Normes de citation pour RSM Simplified
APA 6 Citation
Anderson, M., & Whitcomb, P. (2016). RSM Simplified (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/1575775/rsm-simplified-optimizing-processes-using-response-surface-methods-for-design-of-experiments-second-edition-pdf (Original work published 2016)
Chicago Citation
Anderson, Mark, and Patrick Whitcomb. (2016) 2016. RSM Simplified. 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/1575775/rsm-simplified-optimizing-processes-using-response-surface-methods-for-design-of-experiments-second-edition-pdf.
Harvard Citation
Anderson, M. and Whitcomb, P. (2016) RSM Simplified. 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/1575775/rsm-simplified-optimizing-processes-using-response-surface-methods-for-design-of-experiments-second-edition-pdf (Accessed: 14 October 2022).
MLA 7 Citation
Anderson, Mark, and Patrick Whitcomb. RSM Simplified. 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis, 2016. Web. 14 Oct. 2022.