Blended Learning
eBook - ePub

Blended Learning

Research Perspectives, Volume 3

Anthony G. Picciano, Charles D. Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal, Anthony G. Picciano, Charles D. Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal

  1. 414 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Blended Learning

Research Perspectives, Volume 3

Anthony G. Picciano, Charles D. Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal, Anthony G. Picciano, Charles D. Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, Volume 3 offers new insights into the state of blended learning, an instructional modality that combines face-to-face and digitally mediated experiences. Education has recently seen remarkable advances in instructional technologies such as adaptive and personalized instruction, virtual learning environments, gaming, analytics, and big data software. This book examines how these and other evolving tools are fueling advances in our schools, colleges, and universities. Original scholarship from education's top thinkers will prepare researchers and learning designers to tackle major issues relating to learning effectiveness, diversity, economies of scale, and beyond.

Frequently asked questions

How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on ā€œCancel Subscriptionā€ - itā€™s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time youā€™ve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoā€™s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youā€™ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weā€™ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Blended Learning an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Blended Learning by Anthony G. Picciano, Charles D. Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal, Anthony G. Picciano, Charles D. Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Education & Inclusive Education. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Publisher
Routledge
Year
2021
ISBN
9781000451467
Edition
1

Section V

Kā€“12 Perspectives

12
Competencies and Practices for Guiding Kā€“12 Blended Teacher Readiness

Cecil R. Short, Courtney Hanny, Michelle Jensen, Karen Arnesen, and Charles R. Graham
DOI: 10.4324/9781003037736-17
The increase in blended teaching (BT) across Kā€“12 contexts is difficult to measure because ā€œblended teachingā€ is defined and implemented in a variety of ways (Graham, 2013; Hrastinski, 2019). Some define BT as using a combination of both in-person and online modalities (Allen & Seaman, 2010; Garrison & Kanuka, 2004; Graham, 2006), while others include certain pedagogical implications within their definition (Alammary et al., 2014; Bower et al., 2015; Diep et al., 2017; Garrison & Vaughan, 2008; Picciano, 2009; Staker & Horn, 2012; Zacharis, 2015). The most common definition in Kā€“12 contexts is part of this latter category, describing BT as ā€œat least in part through online delivery, with some element of student control over time, place, path and/or paceā€ (Horn & Staker, 2011, p. 3). Watson and Murin (2014) also require some student control over ā€œtime/pace/path/place,ā€ adding that blended learning (BL) ā€œchanges the instructional model away from one-to-many (teacher-to-students) instruction and toward a personalized, data-driven approachā€ (p. 13). These definitions describe personalization as essential to BT. While some effective blends have aspects of personalization, such pedagogy is not essential to creating a blend (Arnesen et al., 2019). Measuring Kā€“12 implementation of BL is difficult due to definitional murkiness and because implementation can happen at the school level, be led by individual teachers, or remain within individual classrooms (Graham, 2019).
We define BT competencies as the knowledge, skills, and abilities that teachers need to teach in BL contexts, building from competencies presented in Kā€“12 Blended Learning: A Guide to Personalized Learning and Online Integration (Graham, Borup, Short et al., 2019). These competencies approach BL in the broadest sense, as an umbrella term for any combination of both online and in-person instruction (Graham, 2013, 2019), and are therefore pedagogically agnostic. Regardless of chosen pedagogies, BT requires a significant paradigm shift for teachers as it differs from the traditional teaching methods many experienced as students and have been trained to use as pre-service and in-service teachers (Greene & Hale, 2017). Various sources have identified or suggested competencies necessary for BT but have not evaluated them in terms of prevalence in practice. Pulham and Graham (2018) reviewed 17 documents with Kā€“12 BT competencies and synthesized six competency areas for BT. Subsequently, Pulham et al. (2018) found that many of the individual competencies identified were not specific to BT contexts.
There are pedagogical implications for understanding and identifying the most influential BT competencies. Greene and Hale (2017) called for pre- service and in-service training for blended and online teaching, explaining that twenty-first-century teachers may be expected to ā€œfacilitate learning that lives up to the potential of both modes of educationā€ (p. 147). As BL becomes more prevalent, teacher preparation programs need to prepare novice teachers for BT. Pre-service curriculum will need to include competencies specific to blended pedagogy because generic teaching competencies do not capture all the skills necessary for BT (Pulham et al., 2018). Identifying competency areas that are relevant to BT in Kā€“12 contexts will help teacher educators know what to emphasize in their pre-service training and how to assist in-service teachers, administrators, and professional development leaders as they transition traditional, in-person classes to blended classes.

Literature Review

As demand for BL increases (Barbour, 2017), understanding the relative prevalence of BT competencies becomes more urgent (Dziuban et al., 2018; Eisenbach, 2016). Researchers have demonstrated that skills and practices associated with BT are not the same as those needed for in-person or online teaching (Pulham et al., 2018; Graham, Borup, Short et al., 2019). Based on frameworks presented in literature, BT is not simply the addition of technology to the classroom (Archambault et al., 2014; Bjekic et al., 2010; Oliver & Stallings, 2014). Yet most PD programs targeting BL focus on technology tools instead of blended competencies (Graham, Borup, Pulham et al., 2019). Since the competencies associated with BT vary so dramatically from those of other forms of teaching, blended education requires a more deliberate and specific emphasis on professional development (Eisenbach, 2016; Ojaleye & Awofala, 2018; Pulham et al., 2018).
Many researchers have identified specific competencies to improve educatorsā€™ successful implementation of BL (Akarawang et al., 2015; Anthony, 2019; Bjekic et al., 2010; Oliver & Stallings, 2014; Pulham & Graham, 2018). Pulham and Graham (2018) identified eight pre-service teacher competency areas for online and blended learning. Graham, Borup, Pulham et al. (2019) built on this research, creating a rigorously validated framework with 13 competency areas, through which teachers could assess their readiness to start blending. Graham, Borup, Short et al. (2019) refined this work in their guide to BT with a framework consisting of foundational dispositions and technology skills, with four competency areas: online integration, data practices, personalization, and online interaction (Figure 12.1). These competency areas were used to direct the research presented in this chapter.
Figure 12.1 Blended Teaching Competency Framework
Source: (Graham, Borup, Short et al., 2019)

Research Questions

This research sought to connect the competency areas from Graham, Borup, Short et al. (2019) to current Kā€“12 BT practices by answering the following questions:
  1. How do proposed BT competency areas relate to actual Kā€“12 BT pedagogical practices?
  2. What examples can be found of quality BT practices within the competency areas of online integration, data practices, personalization, and online interaction?
  3. What areas for potential growth for experienced Kā€“12 blended teachers are revealed by investigation of BT competency areas?

Methods

We answered these questions by implementing two separate though related methodologies. First, we analyzed BT artifacts to establish the prevalence of proposed competency areas in BT practices. Second, we analyzed interviews of teachers with BT experience to uncover examples of effective established practices as well as practices needing further development within each competency area.

Artifact Analysis

The artifacts included 959 observations, interviews, and videos created by the Learning Accelerator, a non-profit group dedicated to connecting Kā€“12 blended practitioners to the knowledge, tools, and networks needed to effectively blend and personalize instruction. The artifacts were collected from over a dozen Kā€“12 districts and span all grade levels. BT competencies from Graham, Borup, Short et al. (2019) were used as a priori codes to analyze the artifacts. We completed independent coding of 372 randomly sampled artifacts, allowing for generalizability to all artifacts with a confidence level of 95% (+/-4%).

Interview Analysis

We identified prospective participants for the interviews through working relationships, recommendations from district-level leaders, recruitment at various conferences, and professional partnerships such as the Learning Accelerator, the Clayton Christensen Institute, and the Digital Learning Collaborative. We requested interviews from strong candidates through email and asked other candidates to fill out a survey designed to vet participants not selected for the first round of interviews. Survey respondents indicating BT experience received additional interview invitations. Participants were located domestically and from various content areas: English language arts, social studies, math, science, computer science, visual and performing arts, and others (see Table 12.1). Their teaching experience ranged from 2 to 20 or more years, and each teacher had at least 1 year of BT experience.
Table 12.1 Interview Sampling Strategy Across Grade Levels and Subject Areas
Number of interviews Grade levels Subjects
2 K-3 General
3 4ā€“6 General
3 7ā€“12 Humanities (language arts, foreign languages)
3 7ā€“12 Social sciences (social studies, history)
3 7ā€“12 STEM (science, engineering, math)
3 7ā€“12 Arts (visual arts, performing arts, music)
3 7ā€“12 Other (physical education, health, FACS, special education)
When candidates agreed to participate, they signed an informed consent form and scheduled an interview. We conducted semi-structured interviews, lasting approximately 90 minutes, using a video conferencing platform that automatically generates transcriptions. We designed the interview protocol to explore participantsā€™ implementation of the four competency areas identified by Graham, Borup, Short et al. (2019). Research assistants prepared and anonymized the video transcriptions, which we uploaded to NVivo for coding using a thematic analys...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Half Title
  3. Title
  4. Copyright
  5. Dedication
  6. Contents
  7. About the Editors
  8. List of Contributors
  9. Preface
  10. Acknowledgements
  11. Section I Introduction and Foundations
  12. Section II Student Outcomes
  13. Section III Faculty Issues
  14. Section IV Adaptive Learning Research
  15. Section V Kā€“12 Perspectives
  16. Section VI International Perspectives
  17. Section ViI Science and Health Research
  18. The Future
  19. Index
Citation styles for Blended Learning

APA 6 Citation

[author missing]. (2021). Blended Learning (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/2826449/blended-learning-research-perspectives-volume-3-pdf (Original work published 2021)

Chicago Citation

[author missing]. (2021) 2021. Blended Learning. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/2826449/blended-learning-research-perspectives-volume-3-pdf.

Harvard Citation

[author missing] (2021) Blended Learning. 1st edn. Taylor and Francis. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/2826449/blended-learning-research-perspectives-volume-3-pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2022).

MLA 7 Citation

[author missing]. Blended Learning. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis, 2021. Web. 15 Oct. 2022.